Intentionality, Normativity and Naturalism.

Hutto and Satne ( Philosophia, 2015) review current attempts to provide a naturalized content and underline some of the most convincing reasons why they remain inadequate. The authors reframe and update Haugeland's assessment of this research program, but besides describing the particular challenges...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophia Vol. 43; no. 3; pp. 611 - 625
Autor principal: Varga, Somogy
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=112191052&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 112191052
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00483893
        1VPF
      jtl: Philosophia
      issn: 00483893
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2015
      vid: 43
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        112191052
        10.1007/s11406-015-9629-z
      ppf: 611
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 322KB
      tig:
        atl: Intentionality, Normativity and Naturalism.
      aug:
        au: Varga, Somogy
        affil: University of Memphis, Memphis USA
      su:
        Intentionality (Philosophy)
        Normativity (Ethics)
        Naturalism
        Naturalization
        Behaviorism (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Intentionality (Philosophy)
          Normativity (Ethics)
          Naturalism
          Naturalization
          Behaviorism (Psychology)
      keyword:
        Intentionality
        Normativity
      ab: Hutto and Satne ( Philosophia, 2015) review current attempts to provide a naturalized content and underline some of the most convincing reasons why they remain inadequate. The authors reframe and update Haugeland's assessment of this research program, but besides describing the particular challenges facing the different candidate accounts, they also propose what seems to be a promising way to further a debate that has not advanced in recent years. In this paper I argue that a more detailed exploration of some aspects of the neo-behaviorist and neo-pragmatist strategies might be helpful in order to advance the discussion.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophia is a copyright of Springer, 2015. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophia
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N