Limits of search filter development.

Objective: The research attempted to develop search filters for biomedical literature databases that improve retrieval of studies of clinical relevance for the nursing and rehabilitation professions. Methods: Diagnostic testing framework compared machine-culled and practitioner-nominated search term...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Medical Library Association Vol. 104; no. 1; pp. 42 - 47
Main Authors: Wilczynski, Nancy L., Lokker, Cynthia, McKibbon, Kathleen Ann, Hobson, Nicholas, Haynes, R. Brian
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: University of Pittsburgh, University Library System Jan2016
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Objective: The research attempted to develop search filters for biomedical literature databases that improve retrieval of studies of clinical relevance for the nursing and rehabilitation professions. Methods: Diagnostic testing framework compared machine-culled and practitioner-nominated search terms with a hand-tagged clinical literature database. Results: We were unable to: (1) develop filters for nursing, likely because of the overlapping and expanding scope of practice for nurses in comparison with medical professionals, or (2) develop filters for rehabilitation, because of its broad scope and the profession's multifaceted understanding of "health and ability." Conclusions: We found limitations on search filter development for these health professions: nursing and rehabilitation.