Is there an EU Copyright Jurisprudence? An Empirical Analysis of the Workings of the European Court of Justice.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has seen a dramatic and controversial increase in copyright cases during the last decade. This study investigates empirically two claims: (i) that the Court has failed to develop a coherent copyright jurisprudence (lacking domain expertise, copyright specif...
| Publicado en: | Modern Law Review Vol. 79; no. 1; pp. 31 - 76 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jan2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=112335836&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 112335836 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00267961 D8H jtl: Modern Law Review issn: 00267961 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2016 vid: 79 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 112335836 10.1111/1468-2230.12166 ppf: 31 ppct: 45 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.3MB tig: atl: Is there an EU Copyright Jurisprudence? An Empirical Analysis of the Workings of the European Court of Justice. aug: au: Favale, Marcella Kretschmer, Martin Torremans, Paul C. su: Court of Justice of the European Union European law Copyright Jurisprudence Consequentialism (Ethics) sug: subj: Court of Justice of the European Union European law Copyright Jurisprudence Consequentialism (Ethics) ab: The Court of Justice of the European Union has seen a dramatic and controversial increase in copyright cases during the last decade. This study investigates empirically two claims: (i) that the Court has failed to develop a coherent copyright jurisprudence (lacking domain expertise, copyright specific reasoning, and predictability); (ii) that the Court has pursued an activist, harmonising agenda (resorting to teleological interpretation of European law). We analyse the allocation of copyright and database right cases by Chambers of the Court, Advocate General (AG) and Reporting Judge, and investigate the biographical background of the Judges and AGs sitting. We trace patterns of reasoning in the Court's approach through quantitative content analysis. Legal topoi that are employed in the opinions and decisions are linked to the outcomes of each case. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Modern Law Review holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|