Impact of early haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in patients undergoing emergency surgery: an open prospective, randomised trial.

Haemodynamic goal-directed therapies (GDT) may improve outcome following elective major surgery. So far, few data exist regarding haemodynamic optimization during emergency surgery. In this randomized, controlled trial, 50 surgical patients with hypovolemic or septic conditions were enrolled and we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 87 - 100
Autores principales: Pavlovic, Gordana, Diaper, John, Ellenberger, Christoph, Frei, Angela, Bendjelid, Karim, Bonhomme, Fanny, Licker, Marc
Formato: research randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=112814886&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 112814886
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13871307
        OHC
      jtl: Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing
      issn: 13871307
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2016
      vid: 30
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        112814886
        112814886
        NLM25851818
        112814886
        10.1007/s10877-015-9691-x
        NLM25851818
        112814886
      ppf: 87
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Impact of early haemodynamic goal-directed therapy in patients undergoing emergency surgery: an open prospective, randomised trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Pavlovic, Gordana
          Diaper, John
          Ellenberger, Christoph
          Frei, Angela
          Bendjelid, Karim
          Bonhomme, Fanny
          Licker, Marc
        affil: Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Geneva, rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 1211 Geneva Switzerland
      sug:
        subj:
          Surgery, Operative Methods
          Algorithms
          Emergency Treatment Methods
          Heart Function Tests Methods
          Fluid Therapy Methods
          Patient Care Plans
          Male
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Aged
          Middle Age
          Human
          Reproducibility of Results
          Recurrence Prevention and Control
          Prospective Studies
          Treatment Outcomes
          Intraoperative Monitoring Methods
          Female
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Scales
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Haemodynamic goal-directed therapies (GDT) may improve outcome following elective major surgery. So far, few data exist regarding haemodynamic optimization during emergency surgery. In this randomized, controlled trial, 50 surgical patients with hypovolemic or septic conditions were enrolled and we compared two algorithms of GDTs based either on conventional parameters and pressure pulse variation (control group) or on cardiac index, global end-diastolic volume index and stroke volume variation as derived from the PiCCO monitoring system (optimized group). Postoperative outcome was estimated by a composite index including major complications and by the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score within the first 3 days after surgery (POD1, POD2 and POD3). Data from 43 patients were analyzed (control group, N = 23; optimized group, N = 20). Similar amounts of fluid were given in the two groups. Intraoperatively, dobutamine was given in 45 % optimized patients but in no control patients. Major complications occurred more frequently in the optimized group [19 (95 %) versus 10 (40 %) in the control group, P < 0.001]. Likewise, SOFA scores were higher in the optimized group on POD1 (10.2 ± 2.5 versus 6.6 ± 2.2 in the control group, P = 0.001), POD2 (8.4 ± 2.6 vs 5.0 ± 2.4 in the control group, P = 0.002) and POD 3 (5.2 ± 3.6 and 2.2 ± 1.3 in the control group, P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in hospital mortality (13 % in the control group and 25 % in the optimized group). Haemodynamic optimization based on volumetric and flow PiCCO-derived parameters was associated with a less favorable postoperative outcome compared with a conventional GDT protocol during emergency surgery.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N