Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes.

Purpose: Ambulatory and diary methods of self-reported symptoms and well-being have received increasing interest in recent years. These methods are a valuable addition to traditional strategies for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in that they capture patients' recent symptom exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Quality of Life Research Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 497 - 507
Autores principales: Schneider, Stefan, Stone, Arthur, Stone, Arthur A
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=113139864&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 113139864
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09629343
        GPQ
      jtl: Quality of Life Research
      issn: 09629343
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2016
      vid: 25
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        113139864
        113139864
        NLM26101141
        113139864
        10.1007/s11136-015-1054-z
        NLM26101141
        PMC4689672 [Available on 03/01/17]
        113139864
      ppf: 497
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Ambulatory and diary methods can facilitate the measurement of patient-reported outcomes.
      aug:
        au:
          Schneider, Stefan
          Stone, Arthur
          Stone, Arthur A
        affil: Dornsife Center for Self-Report Science, Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, 635 Downey Way Los Angeles 90089-3332 USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Self Report
          Quality of Life
          Health Status Indicators
          Outcome Assessment
          Medical Records
          Reproducibility of Results
          Memory
          Human
          Funding Source
      ab: Purpose: Ambulatory and diary methods of self-reported symptoms and well-being have received increasing interest in recent years. These methods are a valuable addition to traditional strategies for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in that they capture patients' recent symptom experiences repeatedly in their natural environments. In this article, we review ways that incorporating diary methods into PRO measurement can facilitate research on quality of life.Methods: Several diary methods are currently available, and they include "real-time" (Ecological Momentary Assessment) and "near-real-time" (end-of-day assessments, Day Reconstruction Method) formats. We identify the key benefits of these methods for PRO research.Results: (1) In validity testing, diary assessments can serve as a standard for evaluating the ecological validity and for identifying recall biases of PRO instruments with longer-term recall formats. (2) In research and clinical settings, diaries have the ability to closely capture variations and dynamic changes in quality of life that are difficult or not possible to obtain from traditional PRO assessments. (3) In test construction, repeated diary assessments can expand understanding of the measurement characteristics (e.g., reliability, dimensionality) of PROs in that parameters for differences between people can be compared with those for variation within people.Conclusions: Diary assessment strategies can enrich the repertoire of PRO assessment tools and enhance the measurement of patients' quality of life.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N