The Psychometric Performance of the PROMIS Smoking Assessment Toolkit: Comparisons of Real-Data Computer Adaptive Tests, Short Forms, and Mode of Administration.
Introduction: The PROMIS Smoking Initiative has developed six item banks for assessment related to cigarette smoking among adult smokers (Nicotine Dependence, Coping Expectancies, Emotional and Sensory Expectancies, Health Expectancies, Psychosocial Expectancies, and Social Motivations). This articl...
| Publicado en: | Nicotine & Tobacco Research Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 361 - 366 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Mar2016
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=113198213&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 113198213 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14622203 57O jtl: Nicotine & Tobacco Research issn: 14622203 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2016 vid: 18 iid: 3 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 113198213 113198213 NLM25854962 113198213 10.1093/ntr/ntv083 NLM25854962 113198213 ppf: 361 ppct: 5 formats: tig: atl: The Psychometric Performance of the PROMIS Smoking Assessment Toolkit: Comparisons of Real-Data Computer Adaptive Tests, Short Forms, and Mode of Administration. aug: au: Stucky, Brian D. Huang, Wenjing Edelen, Maria Orlando affil: Department of Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA sug: subj: Smoking Epidemiology Smoking Psychosocial Factors Internet Standards Resource Databases Standards Prospective Studies Substance Use Disorders Psychosocial Factors Female Substance Use Disorders Diagnosis Substance Use Disorders Epidemiology Computers and Computerization Standards Psychometrics Methods Reproducibility of Results Factor Analysis Male Human Adult Validation Studies Comparative Studies Evaluation Research Multicenter Studies Funding Source Adult: 19-44 years Female Male ab: Introduction: The PROMIS Smoking Initiative has developed six item banks for assessment related to cigarette smoking among adult smokers (Nicotine Dependence, Coping Expectancies, Emotional and Sensory Expectancies, Health Expectancies, Psychosocial Expectancies, and Social Motivations). This article evaluates the psychometric performance of the banks when administered via short form (SF), computer adaptive test (CAT), and by mode of administration (computer vs. paper-and-pencil).Methods: Data are from two sources: an internet sample (N = 491) of daily and nondaily smokers who completed both SFs and CATs via the web and a community sample (N = 369) that completed either paper-and-pencil or computer administration of the SFs at two time points. First a CAT version of the PROMIS Smoking Assessment Toolkit was evaluated by comparing item administration rates and scores to the SF administration. Next, we considered the effect of computer versus paper-and-pencil administration on scoring and test-retest reliability.Results: Across the domains approximately 5.4 to 10.3 items were administered on average for the CAT. SF and CAT item response theory-scores were correlated from 0.82 to 0.92 across the domains. Cronbach's alpha for the four- to eight-item SFs among daily smokers ranged from .80 to .91 and .82 to .91 for paper-and-pencil and computer administrations, respectively. Test-retest reliability of the SFs ranged from 0.79 to 0.89 across mode of administration.Conclusions: Results indicate that the SF and CAT and computer and paper-and-pencil administrations provide highly comparable scores for daily and nondaily smokers, but preference for SF or CAT administration may vary by smoking domain. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|