Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed?
What factors contribute to redundant target processing speed besides statistical facilitation? One possibility is that multiple percepts may drive these effects. Another, although not mutually exclusive hypothesis, is that cross-channel cueing from one modality to another may influence response time...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Psychology Vol. 129; no. 1; pp. 11 - 22 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Illinois Press
Spring2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=113212542&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 113212542 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00029556 AJY jtl: American Journal of Psychology issn: 00029556 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2016 vid: 129 iid: 1 pid: 416 pub: University of Illinois Press artinfo: ui: 113212542 10.5406/amerjpsyc.129.1.0011 ppf: 11 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed? aug: au: ALTIERI, NICHOLAS WENGER, MICHAEL J. WALLACE, MARK T. STEVENSON, RYAN A. affil: Idaho State University University of Oklahoma Vanderbilt University University of Toronto su: Auditory perception testing Visual perception testing Optical illusions Human information processing Prompts (Psychology) sug: subj: Auditory perception testing Visual perception testing Optical illusions Human information processing Prompts (Psychology) keyword: cross-channel cueing cross-modal facilitation cross-channel cueing cross-modal facilitation ab: What factors contribute to redundant target processing speed besides statistical facilitation? One possibility is that multiple percepts may drive these effects. Another, although not mutually exclusive hypothesis, is that cross-channel cueing from one modality to another may influence response times. We implemented an auditory-visual detection task using the sound-induced flash illusion to examine whether one or both of these possibilities contributes to changes in processing speed; we did so by examining the data of individual participants. Our results indicated shorter response times in several participants when multiple flashes were perceived in the standard sound-induced flash illusion, thereby replicating previous work in the literature. Additionally, we found evidence for faster responses in several participants when carrying out the same analysis in trials in which 1 beep was presented with 2 real flashes. Overall, our analysis indicates that some observers benefit from cross-modal facilitation, whereas others may benefit from a combination of cross-modal facilitation and increased perceptual judgments. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|