Measurement precision for Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire versus a web-based computer adaptive testing for measuring back pain.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Relative precision is to denote the ratio of the error variance of two sample designs. The aim of the present study was to compare measurement precisions of the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and a computer adaptive testing (CAT) method for measuring disabilit...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 145 - 153 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | algorithm research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=113616460&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 113616460 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10538127 3MD jtl: Journal of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation issn: 10538127 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2015 vid: 28 iid: 1 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 113616460 113616460 113616460 10.3233/BMR-140502 113616460 ppf: 145 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Measurement precision for Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire versus a web-based computer adaptive testing for measuring back pain. aug: au: Bongsam Choi affil: Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Woosong University, Daejeon, Korea sug: subj: Back Pain Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing Questionnaires Pain Measurement Methods Precision Human Cross Sectional Studies Convenience Sample Rasch Analysis Descriptive Statistics Confidence Intervals Florida Data Analysis Software Adolescence Adult Middle Age Aged Male Female P-Value Pearson's Correlation Coefficient Funding Source Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Male Female ab: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Relative precision is to denote the ratio of the error variance of two sample designs. The aim of the present study was to compare measurement precisions of the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and a computer adaptive testing (CAT) method for measuring disability resulting from back pain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A cross-sectional study was carried out with two independent convenient samples from two out-patient rehabilitation clinics for back pain (N = 42) and non-back pain groups (N = 42). Participants were asked to fill out the ODQ and CAT of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – Activity Measure (ICF-AM). A series of Rasch analyses were performed to calculate person ability measures. RESULTS: The CAT measures had greater precision in discriminating the groups than did the ODQ measure in comparisons of the relative precision. CONCLUSIONS: The CAT measure appears to be more effective than the ODQ measure in terms of measurement precision. By administering test items calibrated in a way, CAT measures using item response theory may promise a means with measurement precision as well as efficiency. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: algorithm research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|