Enhancing Breast Cancer Recurrence Algorithms Through Selective Use of Medical Record Data.

Background: The utility of data-based algorithms in research has been questioned because of errors in identification of cancer recurrences. We adapted previously published breast cancer recurrence algorithms, selectively using medical record (MR) data to improve classification.Methods: We evaluated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute Vol. 108; no. 3; pp. 1 - 8
Autores principales: Kroenke, Candyce H., Chubak, Jessica, Johnson, Lisa, Castillo, Adrienne, Weltzien, Erin, Caan, Bette J.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Mar2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=113660975&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 113660975
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00278874
        JNC
      jtl: JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
      issn: 00278874
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2016
      vid: 108
      iid: 3
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        113660975
        113660975
        NLM26582243
        113660975
        10.1093/jnci/djv336
        NLM26582243
        113660975
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Enhancing Breast Cancer Recurrence Algorithms Through Selective Use of Medical Record Data.
      aug:
        au:
          Kroenke, Candyce H.
          Chubak, Jessica
          Johnson, Lisa
          Castillo, Adrienne
          Weltzien, Erin
          Caan, Bette J.
        affil: Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research, Oakland, CA
      sug:
        subj:
          Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Epidemiology
          Medical Records
          Algorithms
          Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Diagnosis
          Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Breast Neoplasms Epidemiology
          United States
          Adult
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Mortality
          Odds Ratio
          Middle Age
          Prognosis
          Breast Neoplasms Mortality
          Prospective Studies
          Female
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Aged
          Risk Factors
          Funding Source
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Female
      ab: Background: The utility of data-based algorithms in research has been questioned because of errors in identification of cancer recurrences. We adapted previously published breast cancer recurrence algorithms, selectively using medical record (MR) data to improve classification.Methods: We evaluated second breast cancer event (SBCE) and recurrence-specific algorithms previously published by Chubak and colleagues in 1535 women from the Life After Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) and 225 women from the Women's Health Initiative cohorts and compared classification statistics to published values. We also sought to improve classification with minimal MR examination. We selected pairs of algorithms-one with high sensitivity/high positive predictive value (PPV) and another with high specificity/high PPV-using MR information to resolve discrepancies between algorithms, properly classifying events based on review; we called this "triangulation." Finally, in LACE, we compared associations between breast cancer survival risk factors and recurrence using MR data, single Chubak algorithms, and triangulation.Results: The SBCE algorithms performed well in identifying SBCE and recurrences. Recurrence-specific algorithms performed more poorly than published except for the high-specificity/high-PPV algorithm, which performed well. The triangulation method (sensitivity = 81.3%, specificity = 99.7%, PPV = 98.1%, NPV = 96.5%) improved recurrence classification over two single algorithms (sensitivity = 57.1%, specificity = 95.5%, PPV = 71.3%, NPV = 91.9%; and sensitivity = 74.6%, specificity = 97.3%, PPV = 84.7%, NPV = 95.1%), with 10.6% MR review. Triangulation performed well in survival risk factor analyses vs analyses using MR-identified recurrences.Conclusions: Use of multiple recurrence algorithms in administrative data, in combination with selective examination of MR data, may improve recurrence data quality and reduce research costs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N