Hexavalent chromium and isocyanate exposures during military aircraft painting under crossflow ventilation.

Exposure control systems performance was investigated in an aircraft painting hangar. The ability of the ventilation system and respiratory protection program to limit worker exposures was examined through air sampling during painting of F/A-18C/D strike fighter aircraft, in four field surveys. Air...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene Vol. 13; no. 5; pp. 356 - 372
Autores principales: Bennett, James S., Marlow, David A., Nourian, Fariba, Breay, James, Hammond, Duane
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd May2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=114016909&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 114016909
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15459624
        V1L
      jtl: Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene
      issn: 15459624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2016
      vid: 13
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        114016909
        114016909
        114016909
        10.1080/15459624.2015.1117617
        114016909
      ppf: 356
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Hexavalent chromium and isocyanate exposures during military aircraft painting under crossflow ventilation.
      aug:
        au:
          Bennett, James S.
          Marlow, David A.
          Nourian, Fariba
          Breay, James
          Hammond, Duane
        affil: National Institute for Occupational Health, Division of Applied Research Technology, CincinnatiOhio
      sug:
        subj:
          Aircraft
          Paint Adverse Effects
          Chromium Poisoning
          Organic Chemicals Poisoning
          Occupational Exposure Prevention and Control
          Ventilation Standards
          Human
          Military Personnel
          Monitoring, Physiologic Methods
          Particulate Matter
          Nitrogen Compounds
          Occupational Safety Standards
          Protective Devices Standards
          Inhalation Exposure Prevention and Control
      ab: Exposure control systems performance was investigated in an aircraft painting hangar. The ability of the ventilation system and respiratory protection program to limit worker exposures was examined through air sampling during painting of F/A-18C/D strike fighter aircraft, in four field surveys. Air velocities were measured across the supply filter, exhaust filter, and hangar midplane under crossflow ventilation. Air sampling conducted during painting process phases (wipe-down, primer spraying, and topcoat spraying) encompassed volatile organic compounds, total particulate matter, Cr[VI], metals, nitroethane, and hexamethylene diisocyanate, for two worker groups: sprayers and sprayer helpers (“hosemen”). One of six methyl ethyl ketone and two of six methyl isobutyl ketone samples exceeded the short term exposure limits of 300 and 75 ppm, with means 57 ppm and 63 ppm, respectively. All 12 Cr[VI] 8-hr time-weighted averages exceeded the recommended exposure limit of 1 µg/m3, 11 out of 12 exceeded the permissible exposure limit of 5 µg/m3, and 7 out of 12 exceeded the threshold limit value of 10 µg/m3, with means 38 µg/m3for sprayers and 8.3 µg/m3for hosemen. Hexamethylene diisocyanate means were 5.95 µg/m3 for sprayers and 0.645 µg/m3for hosemen. Total reactive isocyanate group—the total of monomer and oligomer as NCO group mass—showed 6 of 15 personal samples exceeded the United Kingdom Health and Safety Executive workplace exposure limit of 20 µg/m3, with means 50.9 µg/m3for sprayers and 7.29 µg/m3for hosemen. Several exposure limits were exceeded, reinforcing continued use of personal protective equipment. The supply rate, 94.4 m3/s (200,000 cfm), produced a velocity of 8.58 m/s (157 fpm) at the supply filter, while the exhaust rate, 68.7 m3/s (146,000 cfm), drew 1.34 m/s (264 fpm) at the exhaust filter. Midway between supply and exhaust locations, the velocity was 0.528 m/s (104 fpm). Supply rate exceeding exhaust rate created re-circulations, turbulence, and fugitive emissions, while wasting energy. Smoke releases showing more effective ventilation here than in other aircraft painting facilities carries technical feasibility relevance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N