Two regionalisms, two Latin Americas or beyond Latin America? Contributions from a critical and decolonial IPE.
This article reconsiders the hegemonic interpretation of Latin American regionalisms, which have been defined as expressions of the fragmentation power of ideologies. After identifying the main bias and limitations of this approach, two alternative analytical proposals are presented: critical Intern...
| Publicado en: | Third World Quarterly Vol. 37; no. 5; pp. 866 - 883 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=114193718&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 114193718 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01436597 TWQ jtl: Third World Quarterly issn: 01436597 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2016 vid: 37 iid: 5 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 114193718 10.1080/01436597.2015.1109438 ppf: 866 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T db: hlh ui: 114193718 – @attributes: type: P db: hlh ui: 114193718 tig: atl: Two regionalisms, two Latin Americas or beyond Latin America? Contributions from a critical and decolonial IPE. aug: au: Vivares, Ernesto Dolcetti-Marcolini, Michele affil: Departamento de Estudios Internacionales y Comunicación, FLACSO-Ecuador, Quito su: Latin America International economic relations Regionalism History Decolonization -- Social aspects Hegemony -- Social aspects sug: subj: International economic relations Regionalism History Latin America International assistance Decolonization -- Social aspects Hegemony -- Social aspects keyword: critical IPE decoloniality region-ness regionalism critical IPE decoloniality region-ness regionalism ab: This article reconsiders the hegemonic interpretation of Latin American regionalisms, which have been defined as expressions of the fragmentation power of ideologies. After identifying the main bias and limitations of this approach, two alternative analytical proposals are presented: critical International Political Economy (IPE), which reconsiders the region’s heterogeneity as the reflection of a variety of historical trajectories; and the increasingly influential Latin/Latin American modernity/coloniality approach, which re-authorises the voices of a multiplicity of ‘marginal’ subjectivities to the cognoscible world of international studies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|