Help from above.

To the relief of many of America's allies, not least Tony Blair, the Supreme Court announced on November 10th that it would consider the fate of the 660 foreign "enemy combatants" held at the American naval base at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba. The appeal had been filed on behalf of 12 Kuwaitis, two Brito...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Economist Vol. 369; no. 8350; p. 33
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Economist Newspaper Limited 11/15/2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=11424305&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 11424305
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00130613
        ECO
      jtl: Economist
      issn: 00130613
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 11/15/2003
      vid: 369
      iid: 8350
      pid: 161
      pub: Economist Newspaper Limited
    artinfo:
      ui: 11424305
      ppf: 33
      ppct: 0
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Help from above.
      aug:
      su:
        Actions & defenses (Law)
        United States. Supreme Court
        Prisoners of war
        National security
        Courts
        Executive power
        Constitutional law
        Terrorism
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Actions & defenses (Law)
          United States. Supreme Court
          Prisoners of war
          National security
          Courts
          Executive power
          Constitutional law
          Terrorism
      ab: To the relief of many of America's allies, not least Tony Blair, the Supreme Court announced on November 10th that it would consider the fate of the 660 foreign "enemy combatants" held at the American naval base at Guantánamo Bay in Cuba. The appeal had been filed on behalf of 12 Kuwaitis, two Britons and two Australians, who are demanding the right for their cases to be heard by proper American courts, as opposed to the military tribunals the Pentagon is supposed to be arranging for them. The Supreme Court will not consider whether the detainees are being held illegally. Instead, it will look at the technical issue of the legal status of the Guantánamo base, and whether America's civilian courts have jurisdiction over its detainees. In making that decision, the court may also examine the status of all foreigners captured overseas in the war on terror. But even if the court decides that American law extends to the Guantánamo base, thus giving the detainees the protection of the American constitution as well as access to civilian courts, they will still have to convince the courts that they should be freed. In the end, the Supreme Court will have to balance two concepts--the courts' deference to the executive branch on issues of national security during time of war, and any individual's right to due process.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2003
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N