FAMILY RESEMBLANCES BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY POST-SUBJECTIVIST PHILOSOPHY AND ANIMISTIC RELIGIONS.
Criticism of the Cartesian subject and attempts at establishing a post-subjectivist philosophy are prevalent in contemporary continental philosophy. People living in modern Western cultures are frequently characterized as residing in a permanent state of identity crisis. The question "who comes afte...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 89; pp. 48 - 62 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=114356565&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 114356565 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2016 vid: 89 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 114356565 ppf: 48 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.6MB tig: atl: FAMILY RESEMBLANCES BETWEEN CONTEMPORARY POST-SUBJECTIVIST PHILOSOPHY AND ANIMISTIC RELIGIONS. aug: au: Luks, Leo Moor, Argo affil: Institute of Economics and Social Sciences Estonian University of Life Sciences Kreutzwaldi 1a, 51014 Tartu, Estonia su: Resemblance (Philosophy) Religions Identity crises (Psychology) Criticism Cartesianism (Philosophy) sug: subj: Resemblance (Philosophy) Religions Identity crises (Psychology) Criticism Cartesianism (Philosophy) keyword: 20th century philosophy animism animizmas history of religions post-subjectivism post-subjektyvizmas XX a filosofiją religijų istorija animizmas post-subjektyvizmas XX a filosofiją religijų istorija ab: Criticism of the Cartesian subject and attempts at establishing a post-subjectivist philosophy are prevalent in contemporary continental philosophy. People living in modern Western cultures are frequently characterized as residing in a permanent state of identity crisis. The question "who comes after the subject?" is topical both in philosophy and in the daily life of Western people. In this interdisciplinary study, we argue that that there are considerable family resemblances between the aims of post-subjectivist philosophy and animistic religions. We will first provide the requisite background for understanding the animistic treatment of subjectivity by describing three principles: the Principle of Unity, the Principle of Balance, and Complementary Polar Thinking. These principles further develop our treatment of the concept of network thinking, as outlined in our previous joint paper, "Networks and Hierarchies: Two Ways of Thinking". We will then compare the animistic treatment of subjectivity with current critiques of the subject. Although we will not express a normative request for the resurrection of animism, we nonetheless cannot exclude the possibility that the study of animistic principles may provide local solutions to the postmodern crisis of the subject. Šiuolaikinėje kontinentinėje filosofijoje dažna yra karteziškojo subjekto kritika ir bandymai sukurti post-subjektiyvistinę filosofiją. Vakarų kultūros žmonės dažnai apibūdinami kaip gyvenantys nuolatinėje tapatybės krizėje. Klausimas „kas bus po subjekto?“ yra kertinis tiek filosofijoje, tiek vakariečių kasdienybėje. Šiame tarpdalykiniame tyrime mes teigiame, jog esama rimtų šeiminių panašumų tarp post-subjektyvistinės filosofijos ir animistinės religijos tikslų. Pirmiausia aprašomi trys principai, sudarantys kontekstą, be kurio neįmanoma suprasti animistinės subjektyvumo traktuotės: Vienybės principas, Pusiausvyros principas ir Poliarinių priešybių mąstymas. Šie principai toliau plėtoja tinklinio mąstymo idėją, aprašytą ankstesniame mūsų straipsnyje. Paskui palyginama animistinė subjektyvumo traktuotė su šiuolaikine subjekto kritika. Nors ir nekeliame normatyvaus reikalavimo prikelti animizmą, negalime atmesti galimybės, jog animistinių principų tyrimas sudarys prielaidas lokaliems postmodernios subjekto krizės sprendimams. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|