Towards "evidence-making intervention" approaches in the social science of implementation science: The making of methadone in East Africa.

In this commentary, we take the recent introduction of methadone treatment in response to emerging problems of HIV linked to heroin addiction in Kenya as a case for reflecting on the social science of implementation science. We offer a framework of 'evidence-making intervention' which we hold as dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Drug Policy Vol. 30; pp. 17 - 27
Autores principales: Rhodes, Tim, Closson, Elizabeth F., Paparini, Sara, Guise, Andy, Strathdee, Steffanie
Formato: commentary Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Apr2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=114393602&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 114393602
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09553959
        GPD
      jtl: International Journal of Drug Policy
      issn: 09553959
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2016
      vid: 30
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        114393602
        114393602
        NLM26905934
        114393602
        10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.01.002
        NLM26905934
        114393602
      ppf: 17
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Towards "evidence-making intervention" approaches in the social science of implementation science: The making of methadone in East Africa.
      aug:
        au:
          Rhodes, Tim
          Closson, Elizabeth F.
          Paparini, Sara
          Guise, Andy
          Strathdee, Steffanie
        affil: Centre for Research on Drugs and Health Behaviour, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Methadone Administration and Dosage
          Substance Use Disorders Rehabilitation
          HIV Infections Prevention and Control
          Professional Practice, Evidence-Based
          Health Policy
          Kenya
          Substance Use Disorders Epidemiology
          HIV Infections Epidemiology
          Funding Source
      ab: In this commentary, we take the recent introduction of methadone treatment in response to emerging problems of HIV linked to heroin addiction in Kenya as a case for reflecting on the social science of implementation science. We offer a framework of 'evidence-making intervention' which we hold as distinct from mainstream 'evidence-based intervention' approaches. Whilst accepting that interventions are shaped in their contexts, evidence-based intervention approaches tend to imagine a stable intervention object with universal effect potential. By contrast, an evidence-making intervention approach investigates how an intervention, and the knowledge which constitutes it, is made locally, through its processes of implementation. Drawing on qualitative research generated in Kenya prior to (2012-2013) and during (2014-2015) the implementation of methadone treatment, we explore the making of 'methadone promise' as a case of evidence-making intervention. We show how enactments of methadone promise make multiple methadones, through which a binary is negotiated between the narratives of methadone as hope for addiction recovery and methadone as hope for HIV prevention. Addiction recovery narratives predominate, despite methadone's incorporation into policy via its globally supported HIV prevention evidence-base. Key practices in the making of methadone promise in Kenya include its medicalization, and renaming, as 'medically assisted treatment' - or simply 'MAT' - which distance it from prior constitutions elsewhere as a drug of substitution, and the visualisation of its effects wherein unhealthy people can be seen and shown to have become well. We also show how actors seek to protect the story of methadone promise from counter narratives, including through mass media projects. We conclude that there is no single biomedical object of methadone intervening on a single biological body across contexts, and no single universe of evidence. By giving weight to local rather than outside expert knowledge, and by tracing how the meaning of intervention is made locally through its implementation, we can make visible the multiple enactments of an intervention and how these shape local ecologies of care, including in ways beyond those foreseen by an intervention's evidencing elsewhere.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        commentary
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N