The Newtonian Myth

I examine Popper’s claims about Newton’s use of induction in Principia with the actual contents of Principia and draw two conclusions. Firstly, in common with most other philosophers of his generation, it appears that Popper had very little acquaintance with the contents and methodological complexit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 763 - 781
Autor principal: Davies, E. B.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Dec2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=11465760&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 11465760
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00393681
        HPS
      jtl: Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A
      issn: 00393681
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2003
      vid: 34
      iid: 4
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        11465760
        10.1016/S0039-3681(03)00045-1
      ppf: 763
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The Newtonian Myth
      aug:
        au: Davies, E. B.
        affil: Department of Mathematics, King’s College, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK
      su:
        Induction (Logic)
        Newton-Raphson method
        Philosophy
      sug:
        subj:
          Induction (Logic)
          Newton-Raphson method
          Philosophy
      keyword:
        Induction
        Kepler’s laws
        Newton
        Popper
        Principia
      ab: I examine Popper’s claims about Newton’s use of induction in Principia with the actual contents of Principia and draw two conclusions. Firstly, in common with most other philosophers of his generation, it appears that Popper had very little acquaintance with the contents and methodological complexities of Principia beyond what was in the famous General Scholium. Secondly Popper’s ideas about induction were less sophisticated than those of Newton, who recognised that it did not provide logical proofs of the results obtained using it, because of the possibilities of later, contrary evidence. I also trace the historical background to commonplace misconceptions about Newton’s method.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2003
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N