Power and Persuasion.

In familiar accounts of power, if agent i can induce j to change their beliefs then i has power over j to induce belief change. Does that mean that all deliberation is simply a power game? This article examines two connected 'reliability conditions' that distinguish when such persuasion is coercive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Political Studies Vol. 64; pp. 4 - 19
Autor principal: Dowding, Keith
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 2016 Supplement 1
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=114678743&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 114678743
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00323217
        PSZ
      jtl: Political Studies
      issn: 00323217
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2016 Supplement 1
      vid: 64
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        114678743
        10.1177/0032321715614848
      ppf: 4
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            db: hlh
            ui: 114678743
      tig:
        atl: Power and Persuasion.
      aug:
        au: Dowding, Keith
        affil: School of Politics and International Relations, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
      su:
        Power (Social sciences) -- Social aspects
        Belief change
        Trust
        Manipulative behavior
        Persuasion (Rhetoric)
        Intention
        Deliberation
        Authority -- Social aspects
      sug:
        subj:
          Power (Social sciences) -- Social aspects
          Belief change
          Trust
          Manipulative behavior
          Persuasion (Rhetoric)
          Intention
          Deliberation
          Authority -- Social aspects
      keyword:
        argument
        deliberation
        democracy
        persuasion
        power
        argument
        deliberation
        democracy
        persuasion
        power
      ab: In familiar accounts of power, if agent i can induce j to change their beliefs then i has power over j to induce belief change. Does that mean that all deliberation is simply a power game? This article examines two connected 'reliability conditions' that distinguish when such persuasion is coercive or manipulative: common reason and the intentions of the persuader. It considers three problems, (1) testimony, (2) authority, (3) trust, and why these do not belie the account. While the conditions are strict and perhaps no actual deliberation or persuasion fully abides by them, they constitute normative conditions for making judgements about the degree of manipulation in any deliberation. I also briefly consider the power of discourse as an activity in itself.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N