The Self-Evidencing Brain.

An exciting theory in neuroscience is that the brain is an organ for prediction error minimization (PEM). This theory is rapidly gaining influence and is set to dominate the science of mind and brain in the years to come. PEM has extreme explanatory ambition, and profound philosophical implications....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nous (0029-4624) Vol. 50; no. 2; pp. 259 - 286
Autor principal: Hohwy, Jakob
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=114785805&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 114785805
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00294624
        D97
      jtl: Nous (0029-4624)
      issn: 00294624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2016
      vid: 50
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        114785805
        10.1111/nous.12062
      ppf: 259
      ppct: 27
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 190KB
      tig:
        atl: The Self-Evidencing Brain.
      aug:
        au: Hohwy, Jakob
        affil: Monash University
      su:
        Neurosciences
        Skepticism
        Cognition
        Cognitive ability
        Cognitive development
      sug:
        subj:
          Neurosciences
          Skepticism
          Cognition
          Cognitive ability
          Cognitive development
      ab: An exciting theory in neuroscience is that the brain is an organ for prediction error minimization (PEM). This theory is rapidly gaining influence and is set to dominate the science of mind and brain in the years to come. PEM has extreme explanatory ambition, and profound philosophical implications. Here, I assume the theory, briefly explain it, and then I argue that PEM implies that the brain is essentially self-evidencing. This means it is imperative to identify an evidentiary boundary between the brain and its environment. This boundary defines the mind-world relation, opens the door to skepticism, and makes the mind transpire as more inferentially secluded and neurocentrically skull-bound than many would nowadays think. Therefore, PEM somewhat deflates contemporary hypotheses that cognition is extended, embodied and enactive; however, it can nevertheless accommodate the kinds of cases that fuel these hypotheses.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Nous (0029-4624) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Nous (0029-4624)
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N