Critical Thinking as a Predictor of Certification Exam Performance in Medical Laboratory Science.

The purpose of this study was to examine the value of critical thinking skills in predicting American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Board of Certification (BOC) exam scores for the Medical Laboratory Science (MLS) category. Existing data for undergraduate students in an accredited MLS progra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Clinical Laboratory Science Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 76 - 83
Autor principal: SOLBERG, BROOKE L.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Society for Clinical Laboratory Science Spring2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this study was to examine the value of critical thinking skills in predicting American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP) Board of Certification (BOC) exam scores for the Medical Laboratory Science (MLS) category. Existing data for undergraduate students in an accredited MLS program during the years of 2009-2012 were examined. Specifically, scores from a Critical Thinking Exercise (CTE) administered during the application process, along with Grade Point Average (GPA), Science Grade Point Average (SGPA), and ASCP BOC exam and subsection scores were analyzed. Results suggest that the CTE is a weak to negligible predictor of ASCP BOC exam performance (r=0.113), while GPA and SGPA are stronger, statistically significant predictors (r=0.358; r=0.428; p<.05). Although critical thinking skills did not significantly predict ASCP BOC exam scores, other implications for their predictive utility exist and are discussed in light of the findings from this and other existing studies within the health professions.