The Social Benefits of Protecting Hate Speech and Exposing Sources of Prejudice.

I argue that there are strong consequentialist grounds for thinking that hate speech should be legally protected. The protection of hate speech allows those who are hateful to make their beliefs public, thereby exposing prejudices that might otherwise be suppressed to evaluation by other members of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Res Publica (13564765) Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 225 - 243
Autor principal: Schulzke, Marcus
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature May2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=115296007&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 115296007
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13564765
        NMV
      jtl: Res Publica (13564765)
      issn: 13564765
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2016
      vid: 22
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        115296007
        10.1007/s11158-015-9282-1
      ppf: 225
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 437KB
      tig:
        atl: The Social Benefits of Protecting Hate Speech and Exposing Sources of Prejudice.
      aug:
        au: Schulzke, Marcus
        affil: University of Leeds, Leeds UK
      su:
        Hate speech
        Prejudices
        Authority
        Freedom of speech
        Speech -- Law & legislation
      sug:
        subj:
          Hate speech
          Prejudices
          Authority
          Freedom of speech
          Speech -- Law & legislation
      keyword:
        Free speech
        Prejudice
        Rights
      ab: I argue that there are strong consequentialist grounds for thinking that hate speech should be legally protected. The protection of hate speech allows those who are hateful to make their beliefs public, thereby exposing prejudices that might otherwise be suppressed to evaluation by other members of society. This greater transparency about prejudices has two social benefits. First, it facilitates social trust by making it easier to discover who holds beliefs that should exclude them from positions of authority, responsibility, and influence. Second, it facilitates efforts to combat hatred by revealing which prejudiced members of society must be persuaded or discredited by those seeking to promote tolerance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Res Publica (13564765) is a copyright of Springer, 2016. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Res Publica (13564765)
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N