The Brain Dead Patient Is Still Sentient: A Further Reply to Patrick Lee and Germain Grisez.

Patrick Lee and Germain Grisez have argued that the total brain dead patient is still dead because the integrated entity that remains is not even an animal, not only because he is not sentient but also, and more importantly, because he has lost the radical capacity for sentience. In this essay, writ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Medicine & Philosophy Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 315 - 329
Autores principales: GIORGIO AUSTRIACO, NICANOR PIER, Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio Op
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jun2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=115352396&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 115352396
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03605310
        MPS
      jtl: Journal of Medicine & Philosophy
      issn: 03605310
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2016
      vid: 41
      iid: 3
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        115352396
        10.1093/jmp/jhw008
      ppf: 315
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 369KB
      tig:
        atl: The Brain Dead Patient Is Still Sentient: A Further Reply to Patrick Lee and Germain Grisez.
      aug:
        au:
          GIORGIO AUSTRIACO, NICANOR PIER
          Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio Op
        affil: Providence College, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
      su:
        Brain death
        Christian philosophy
        Subconsciousness
        Brain function localization
        Bioethics
        Patients
      sug:
        subj:
          Brain death
          Christian philosophy
          Subconsciousness
          Brain function localization
          Bioethics
          Patients
      keyword:
        bodily integration
        brain death
        neurological criteria
        sentience
      ab: Patrick Lee and Germain Grisez have argued that the total brain dead patient is still dead because the integrated entity that remains is not even an animal, not only because he is not sentient but also, and more importantly, because he has lost the radical capacity for sentience. In this essay, written from within and as a contribution to the Catholic philosophical tradition, I respond to Lee and Grisez's argument by proposing that the brain dead patient is still sentient because an animal with an intact but severed spinal cord can still perceive and respond to external stimuli. The brain dead patient is an unconscious sentient organism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc..
      item: Journal of Medicine & Philosophy
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N