Orthographic units in the absence of visual processing: Evidence from sublexical structure in braille.
Reading relies on the recognition of units larger than single letters and smaller than whole words. Previous research has linked sublexical structures in reading to properties of the visual system, specifically on the parallel processing of letters that the visual system enables. But whether the vis...
| Publicado en: | Cognition Vol. 153; pp. 161 - 175 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
Aug2016
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=116001403&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 116001403 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00100277 3H9 jtl: Cognition issn: 00100277 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2016 vid: 153 pid: 1004 pub: Elsevier B.V. artinfo: ui: 116001403 116001403 NLM27206313 116001403 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.021 NLM27206313 116001403 ppf: 161 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Orthographic units in the absence of visual processing: Evidence from sublexical structure in braille. aug: au: Fischer-Baum, Simon Englebretson, Robert affil: Department of Psychology, Rice University, United States sug: subj: Sensory Aids Recognition (Psychology) Linguistics Reading Blindness Male Perception Aged Adult Female Young Adult Human Middle Age Validation Studies Comparative Studies Evaluation Research Multicenter Studies Aged: 65+ years Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: Reading relies on the recognition of units larger than single letters and smaller than whole words. Previous research has linked sublexical structures in reading to properties of the visual system, specifically on the parallel processing of letters that the visual system enables. But whether the visual system is essential for this to happen, or whether the recognition of sublexical structures may emerge by other means, is an open question. To address this question, we investigate braille, a writing system that relies exclusively on the tactile rather than the visual modality. We provide experimental evidence demonstrating that adult readers of (English) braille are sensitive to sublexical units. Contrary to prior assumptions in the braille research literature, we find strong evidence that braille readers do indeed access sublexical structure, namely the processing of multi-cell contractions as single orthographic units and the recognition of morphemes within morphologically-complex words. Therefore, we conclude that the recognition of sublexical structure is not exclusively tied to the visual system. However, our findings also suggest that there are aspects of morphological processing on which braille and print readers differ, and that these differences may, crucially, be related to reading using the tactile rather than the visual sensory modality. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|