Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries.
Abstract — The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group have evaluated and recommended best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty registries. The 2 generic PROMs in...
| Publicado en: | Acta Orthopaedica Vol. 87; pp. 9 - 24 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Medical Journals Sweden AB
Jul2016 Supplement
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=116145383&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 116145383 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17453674 1BVL jtl: Acta Orthopaedica issn: 17453674 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2016 Supplement vid: 87 pid: 59195 pub: Medical Journals Sweden AB artinfo: ui: 116145383 116145383 116145383 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816 116145383 ppf: 9 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries. aug: au: Rolfson, Ola Bohm, Eric Franklin, Patricia Lyman, Stephen Denissen, Geke Dawson, Jill Dunn, Jennifer Eresian Chenok, Kate Dunbar, Michael Overgaard, Søren Garellick, Göran Lübbeke, Anne affil: Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register and Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden sug: subj: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee Outcome Assessment Registries, Disease Outcomes (Health Care) Pain Measurement Patient Satisfaction Documentation ab: Abstract — The International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Working Group have evaluated and recommended best practices in the selection, administration, and interpretation of PROMs for hip and knee arthroplasty registries. The 2 generic PROMs in common use are the Short Form health surveys (SF-36 or SF-12) and EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D). The Working Group recommends that registries should choose specific PROMs that have been appropriately developed with good measurement properties for arthroplasty patients. The Working Group recommend the use of a 1-item pain question (“During the past 4 weeks, how would you describe the pain you usually have in your [right/left] [hip/knee]?”; response: none, very mild, mild, moderate, or severe) and a single-item satisfaction outcome (“How satisfied are you with your [right/left] [hip/knee] replacement?”; response: very unsatisfied, dissatisfied, neutral, satisfied, or very satisfied). Survey logistics include patient instructions, paper- and electronic-based data collection, reminders for follow-up, centralized as opposed to hospital-based follow-up, sample size, patient- or joint-specific evaluation, collection intervals, frequency of response, missing values, and factors in establishing a PROMs registry program. The Working Group recommends including age, sex, diagnosis at joint, general health status preoperatively, and joint pain and function score in case-mix adjustment models. Interpretation and statistical analysis should consider the absolute level of pain, function, and general health status as well as improvement, missing data, approaches to analysis and case-mix adjustment, minimal clinically important difference, and minimal detectable change. The Working Group recommends data collection immediately before and 1 year after surgery, a threshold of 60% for acceptable frequency of response, documentation of non-responders, and documentation of incomplete or missing data. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|