Intratumoral heterogeneity as a source of discordance in breast cancer biomarker classification.

Background: Spatial heterogeneity in biomarker expression may impact breast cancer classification. The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of spatial heterogeneity in biomarker expression within tumors, to identify technical and biological factors contributing to spatial heterogeneity,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Breast Cancer Research Vol. 18; pp. 68 - 69
Autores principales: Allott, Emma H., Geradts, Joseph, Xuezheng Sun, Cohen, Stephanie M., Zirpoli, Gary R., Khoury, Thaer, Bshara, Wiam, Mengjie Chen, Sherman, Mark E., Palmer, Julie R., Ambrosone, Christine B., Olshan, Andrew F., Troester, Melissa A., Sun, Xuezheng, Chen, Mengjie
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 6/28/2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=116580220&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 116580220
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14655411
        8UYJ
      jtl: Breast Cancer Research
      issn: 14655411
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 6/28/2016
      vid: 18
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        116580220
        116580220
        NLM27349894
        116580220
        10.1186/s13058-016-0725-1
        NLM27349894
        PMC4924300
        116580220
      ppf: 68
      ppct: 1
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Intratumoral heterogeneity as a source of discordance in breast cancer biomarker classification.
      aug:
        au:
          Allott, Emma H.
          Geradts, Joseph
          Xuezheng Sun
          Cohen, Stephanie M.
          Zirpoli, Gary R.
          Khoury, Thaer
          Bshara, Wiam
          Mengjie Chen
          Sherman, Mark E.
          Palmer, Julie R.
          Ambrosone, Christine B.
          Olshan, Andrew F.
          Troester, Melissa A.
          Sun, Xuezheng
          Chen, Mengjie
        affil: Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Breast Neoplasms Pathology
          Breast Neoplasms Metabolism
          Tissue Array Analysis Methods
          Proteins Metabolism
          Receptors, Cell Surface Metabolism
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Proteins
          Female
          Immunohistochemistry
          Biopsy
          Prognosis
          Receptors, Cell Surface
          Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Human
          Funding Source
          Female
      ab: Background: Spatial heterogeneity in biomarker expression may impact breast cancer classification. The aims of this study were to estimate the frequency of spatial heterogeneity in biomarker expression within tumors, to identify technical and biological factors contributing to spatial heterogeneity, and to examine the impact of discordant biomarker status within tumors on clinical record agreement.Methods: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed using two to four cores (1.0 mm) for each of 1085 invasive breast cancers from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study, which is part of the AMBER Consortium. Immunohistochemical staining for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was quantified using automated digital imaging analysis. The biomarker status for each core and for each case was assigned using clinical thresholds. Cases with core-to-core biomarker discordance were manually reviewed to distinguish intratumoral biomarker heterogeneity from misclassification of biomarker status by the automated algorithm. The impact of core-to-core biomarker discordance on case-level agreement between TMAs and the clinical record was evaluated.Results: On the basis of automated analysis, discordant biomarker status between TMA cores occurred in 9 %, 16 %, and 18 % of cases for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. Misclassification of benign epithelium and/or ductal carcinoma in situ as invasive carcinoma by the automated algorithm was implicated in discordance among cores. However, manual review of discordant cases confirmed spatial heterogeneity as a source of discordant biomarker status between cores in 2 %, 7 %, and 8 % of cases for ER, PR, and HER2, respectively. Overall, agreement between TMA and clinical record was high for ER (94 %), PR (89 %), and HER2 (88 %), but it was reduced in cases with core-to-core discordance (agreement 70 % for ER, 61 % for PR, and 57 % for HER2).Conclusions: Intratumoral biomarker heterogeneity may impact breast cancer classification accuracy, with implications for clinical management. Both manually confirmed biomarker heterogeneity and misclassification of biomarker status by automated image analysis contribute to discordant biomarker status between TMA cores. Given that manually confirmed heterogeneity is uncommon (<10 % of cases), large studies are needed to study the impact of heterogeneous biomarker expression on breast cancer classification and outcomes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N