Does retrieval intentionality really matter? Similarities and differences between involuntary memories and directly and generatively retrieved voluntary memories.
Theories of autobiographical memory distinguish between involuntary and voluntary retrieval as a consequence of conscious intention (i.e., wanting to remember). Another distinction can be made between direct and generative retrieval, which reflects the effort involved (i.e., trying to remember). How...
| Publicado en: | British Journal of Psychology Vol. 107; no. 3; pp. 519 - 537 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Aug2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=116618672&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 116618672 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00071269 BJP jtl: British Journal of Psychology issn: 00071269 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2016 vid: 107 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 116618672 10.1111/bjop.12160 ppf: 519 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 182KB tig: atl: Does retrieval intentionality really matter? Similarities and differences between involuntary memories and directly and generatively retrieved voluntary memories. aug: au: Barzykowski, Krystian Staugaard, Søren Risløv affil: Applied Memory Research Laboratory, Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow Poland Center on Autobiographical Memory Research, Aarhus University, Denmark su: Poland Memory Undergraduates Confidence intervals Intention Questionnaires Research funding T-test (Statistics) Disease prevalence Descriptive statistics sug: subj: Memory Undergraduates Poland Confidence intervals Intention Questionnaires Research funding T-test (Statistics) Disease prevalence Descriptive statistics keyword: autobiographical memory direct retrieval generative retrieval intention involuntary memories memory recollective experience retrieval mode voluntary memories autobiographical memory direct retrieval generative retrieval intention involuntary memories memory recollective experience retrieval mode voluntary memories ab: Theories of autobiographical memory distinguish between involuntary and voluntary retrieval as a consequence of conscious intention (i.e., wanting to remember). Another distinction can be made between direct and generative retrieval, which reflects the effort involved (i.e., trying to remember). However, it is unclear how intention and effort interacts. For example, involuntary memories and directly retrieved memories have been used interchangeably in the literature to refer to the same phenomenon of effortless, non-strategic retrieval. More recent theoretical advances suggest that they are separate types of retrieval, one unintentional (involuntary), another intentional and effortless (direct voluntary retrieval), and a third intentional and effortful (generative voluntary retrieval). Whether this also entails differing phenomenological characteristics, such as vividness, rehearsal, or emotional valence, has not been previously investigated. In the current study, participants reported memories in an experimental paradigm designed to elicit voluntary and involuntary memories and rated them on a number of characteristics. If intention affects the retrieval process, then we should expect differences between the characteristics of involuntary and directly retrieved memories. The results imply that retrieval intention seems to differentiate how a memory appears in a person's mind. Furthermore, we argue that these differences in part could result from differences in encoding and consolidation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|