Using implementation science to improve urologic oncology care.

There are many gaps between recommended urologic cancer care and real-world practice. Although we increasingly define these quality gaps because of our growing health services research capacity in urologic oncology, we often fall short in translating these findings into effective interventions and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Urologic Oncology Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 384 - 388
Autores principales: Skolarus, Ted A., Sales, Anne E.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Sep2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=117587901&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 117587901
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10781439
        JJ4
      jtl: Urologic Oncology
      issn: 10781439
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2016
      vid: 34
      iid: 9
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        117587901
        117587901
        NLM27401405
        117587901
        10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.022
        NLM27401405
        117587901
      ppf: 384
      ppct: 4
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Using implementation science to improve urologic oncology care.
      aug:
        au:
          Skolarus, Ted A.
          Sales, Anne E.
        affil: Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
      sug:
        subj:
          Oncology Trends
          Oncology
          Communication
          Health Care Delivery
          Human
          Interprofessional Relations
          Study Design
          Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index
          Scales
          Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire
      ab: There are many gaps between recommended urologic cancer care and real-world practice. Although we increasingly define these quality gaps because of our growing health services research capacity in urologic oncology, we often fall short in translating these findings into effective interventions and strategies to reduce gaps in care. In this article, we highlight implementation research as a logical next step for translating our health services research findings into effective individual and organizational behavior change strategies to improve quality of care. We explain how implementation research focuses on different, upstream outcomes from our clinical outcomes to get the right care to the right patient at the right time. Lastly, we share information about resources and training for those interested in learning more about this emerging, transdisciplinary field.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N