Agency and Ontology within Intersectional Analysis: A Critical Realist Contribution.

The article analyses the historical roots of intersectional theory and argues that the ambiguities and elisions that mark intersectional analysis are a weakness not a strength. It makes an argument for why Archer's morphogenetic approach provides a more secure basis for analysing the overlapping opp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Critical Realism Vol. 15; no. 5; pp. 494 - 511
Main Author: Clegg, Sue
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Oct2016
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=117630592&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 117630592
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14767430
        7DS
      jtl: Journal of Critical Realism
      issn: 14767430
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2016
      vid: 15
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        117630592
        10.1080/14767430.2016.1210470
      ppf: 494
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 168KB
      tig:
        atl: Agency and Ontology within Intersectional Analysis: A Critical Realist Contribution.
      aug:
        au: Clegg, Sue
        affil: Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
      su:
        Ontology
        Archer, Margaret Scotford, 1943-2023
        Critical realism
        Feminism
        Poststructuralism
        Intersectionality
      sug:
        subj:
          Ontology
          Archer, Margaret Scotford, 1943-2023
          Critical realism
          Feminism
          Poststructuralism
          Intersectionality
      keyword:
        critical realism
        feminism
        intersectionality
        Margaret Archer
        poststructuralism
      ab: The article analyses the historical roots of intersectional theory and argues that the ambiguities and elisions that mark intersectional analysis are a weakness not a strength. It makes an argument for why Archer's morphogenetic approach provides a more secure basis for analysing the overlapping oppressions that intersectional theory highlights. It avoids conflating experience with structural and cultural conditions and their elaboration, and provides an analytical framework for the development of explanatory accounts of how intersections between gender, race, class and other markers of difference operate in concrete historical circumstances. Equally importantly, critical realism provides rich resources for theorizing agency and in particular corporate agency, which is central to understanding the emergence of social movements, including feminism. The article argues that critical realism provides a basis for maintaining the significance of the normative in analysing social life and, in contrast to poststructuralism, provides a secure philosophical basis for the research programme opened up by a consideration of intersectionality.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Critical Realism is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Critical Realism
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N