BURNING ISSUES: MLK REVISITED.

Basing themselves on otto eissfeldt's 1935 work on the Phoenician-Punic sacrifice known as molk, many biblical scholars followed in his footsteps and opted to substitute the biblical deity Mōlek in the Hebrew Bible with this sacrificial term. However there always were other scholars who disagreed wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Semitic Studies Vol. 61; no. 2; pp. 347 - 365
Autor principal: FRENDO, ANTHONY J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Autumn2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=117795698&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 117795698
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00224480
        SEM
      jtl: Journal of Semitic Studies
      issn: 00224480
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Autumn2016
      vid: 61
      iid: 2
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        117795698
        10.1093/jss/fgw020
      ppf: 347
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: BURNING ISSUES: MLK REVISITED.
      aug:
        au: FRENDO, ANTHONY J.
        affil: UNIVERSITY OF MALTA
      su:
        Child sacrifice
        Moloch (Semitic deity)
        Eissfeldt, Otto
        Old Testament
        Epithets
      sug:
        subj:
          Child sacrifice
          Moloch (Semitic deity)
          Eissfeldt, Otto
          Old Testament
          Epithets
      ab: Basing themselves on otto eissfeldt's 1935 work on the Phoenician-Punic sacrifice known as molk, many biblical scholars followed in his footsteps and opted to substitute the biblical deity Mōlek in the Hebrew Bible with this sacrificial term. However there always were other scholars who disagreed with this position. Recently there has been a renewed surge of interest in the problem as to whether the Carthaginians had literally burnt their children in sacrifice to their gods. This problem touches on related issues found in the Hebrew Bible, and it makes it necessary to look again at some biblical texts to see whether children in ancient israel were indeed sacrificed by burning. When the various ways of vocalizing the semitic word mlk with its basic meaning of 'king' are taken into account alongside the fact that in West semitic there are words which can be used either as the names of deities or simply as their epithets, it becomes more plausible to hold that, although the biblical word 'Mōlek' does indeed refer to a deity, in a number of texts it was most probably originally vocalized as melek and used as an epithet with reference to different gods including Baal and yahweh himself. Indeed, we even encounter composite divine names, one component of which functions as an epithet. Often it was idolatrous child sacrifice that was condemned in the Hebrew Bible and not the sacrifice of children made to yahweh, even when the latter rite was performed at the Topheth in the valley of Hinnom. However, it seems that there was also a non-Tophet group in Israel, which condemned the sacrifice of children tout court whether offered to yahweh or to foreign deities, and this is reflected in certain texts, such as Deuteronomy.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N