Why Pluralism = Pluralism ≠ Monism: A Decolonial Feminist Critique of Deleuze and Guattari's Concept of Becoming.

This essay offers a critical engagement with Deleuze and Guattari's concept of becoming, from the perspective of postcolonial and decolonial feminism. It starts by exploring the main characteristics of becoming, including the provisional continuity of affective liberation among its various modalitie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Deleuze Studies Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 379 - 395
Main Author: Karkov, Nikolay
Format: Article
Published: Edinburgh University Press Aug2016
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:This essay offers a critical engagement with Deleuze and Guattari's concept of becoming, from the perspective of postcolonial and decolonial feminism. It starts by exploring the main characteristics of becoming, including the provisional continuity of affective liberation among its various modalities. It then foregrounds the concept of 'racialised gender', to trace a very different sequence of affective recomposition sponsored by the colonial state. Over and against Deleuze and Guattari's monological perspective as a universal narrative of emancipation (pluralism = monism), the article calls for a multilingual approach in the semantics of evaluating its deployments (pluralism = pluralism ≠ monism).