POSTCOLONIAL STUDIES AND PANTAYONG PANANAW IN PHILIPPINE HISTORIOGRAPHY: A CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT.

This paper offers a platform for a mutually critical imaginary dialogue between two different anti-Eurocentric analytic approaches, Postcolonialism (PC) and Pantayong Pananaw (From-Us, For-Us Perspective, PP). The dialogue foregrounds key areas of engagement between these approaches and allows in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Kritika Kultura no. 27; pp. 63 - 92
Autor principal: Curaming, Rommel A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Kritika Kultura 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=118516041&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 118516041
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        20946937
        786B
      jtl: Kritika Kultura
      issn: 20946937
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2016
      iid: 27
      pid: 51553
      pub: Kritika Kultura
    artinfo:
      ui: 118516041
      ppf: 63
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: POSTCOLONIAL STUDIES AND PANTAYONG PANANAW IN PHILIPPINE HISTORIOGRAPHY: A CRITICAL ENGAGEMENT.
      aug:
        au: Curaming, Rommel A.
        affil: Universiti Brunei Darussalam
      su:
        Postcolonialism
        Christianity & culture
        Critical theory
      sug:
        subj:
          Postcolonialism
          Christianity & culture
          Critical theory
      keyword:
        critical theory
        indigenization
        power/knowledge
        progressive scholarship
      ab: This paper offers a platform for a mutually critical imaginary dialogue between two different anti-Eurocentric analytic approaches, Postcolonialism (PC) and Pantayong Pananaw (From-Us, For-Us Perspective, PP). The dialogue foregrounds key areas of engagement between these approaches and allows in the process to revisit a number of vexing issues that interrogate them as well as the nature of an engaged, pro-marginalized scholarship. It suggests that while each approach can profitability learn from the other, it seems that a truly progressive aspiration may be better served by going beyond the current orientations or foci of the two approaches.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Kritika Kultura is the property of Kritika Kultura and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Kritika Kultura
      holder: Kritika Kultura
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N