Tests for intrinsicness tested.

Various tests have been proposed as helps to identify intrinsic properties. This paper compares three prominent tests (we call them Perfect Duplication, Real Change, and Lonely) and shows that they fail to pass adequate verdicts on a set of three properties. The paper examines whether improved versi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 173; no. 11; pp. 2935 - 2951
Autores principales: McQueen, Kelvin, Woudenberg, René
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=118584391&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 118584391
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2016
      vid: 173
      iid: 11
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        118584391
        10.1007/s11098-016-0644-0
      ppf: 2935
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 390KB
      tig:
        atl: Tests for intrinsicness tested.
      aug:
        au:
          McQueen, Kelvin
          Woudenberg, René
        affil: Faculty of Humanities (Philosophy) , VU University Amsterdam , De Boelelaan 1105 1081 HV Amsterdam The Netherlands
      su:
        Intrinsic factor (Physiology)
        Reality
        Change
        Particle physics
        Quantum mechanics
      sug:
        subj:
          Intrinsic factor (Physiology)
          Reality
          Change
          Particle physics
          Quantum mechanics
      keyword:
        Entanglement
        Extrinsic
        Intrinsic
        Nonseparability
        Properties
        Relational
      ab: Various tests have been proposed as helps to identify intrinsic properties. This paper compares three prominent tests (we call them Perfect Duplication, Real Change, and Lonely) and shows that they fail to pass adequate verdicts on a set of three properties. The paper examines whether improved versions of the tests can reduce or remove these negative outcomes. We reach the sceptical conclusion that whereas some of the tests must be discarded as inadequate because they don't yield definite results, the remaining tests depend for their application on the details of fundamental particle physics so much so that they cannot be relied upon.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2016. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N