Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing.
Why do we formulate arguments? Usually, things such as persuading opponents, finding consensus, and justifying knowledge are listed as functions of arguments. But arguments can also be used to stimulate reflection on one's own reasoning. Since this cognitive function of arguments should be important...
| Publicado en: | Argumentation Vol. 30; no. 4; pp. 365 - 398 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=118763540&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 118763540 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0920427X L8J jtl: Argumentation issn: 0920427X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2016 vid: 30 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 118763540 10.1007/s10503-015-9388-9 ppf: 365 ppct: 33 formats: tig: atl: Reflective Argumentation: A Cognitive Function of Arguing. aug: au: Hoffmann, Michael affil: School of Public Policy , Georgia Institute of Technology , 685 Cherry Street, N.W., DM Smith Building Atlanta 30332-0345 USA su: Reflective learning Oratory Cognitive ability Semiotics Computer-supported cooperative work Critical thinking Open-ended questions Data visualization sug: subj: Reflective learning Oratory Cognitive ability Semiotics Computer-supported cooperative work Critical thinking Open-ended questions Data visualization keyword: Argument functions Argument schemes Argument templates Cognition Computer-supported argument visualization Controversy Education Learning Reflection Wicked problems ab: Why do we formulate arguments? Usually, things such as persuading opponents, finding consensus, and justifying knowledge are listed as functions of arguments. But arguments can also be used to stimulate reflection on one's own reasoning. Since this cognitive function of arguments should be important to improve the quality of people's arguments and reasoning, for learning processes, for coping with 'wicked problems,' and for the resolution of conflicts, it deserves to be studied in its own right. This contribution develops first steps towards a theory of reflective argumentation. It provides a definition of reflective argumentation, justifies its importance, delineates it from other cognitive functions of argumentation in a new classification of argument functions, and it discusses how reflection on one's own reasoning can be stimulated by arguments. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|