Process evaluation of a university subject on service leadership in Hong Kong.

A university subject on service leadership was evaluated via process evaluation at a university in Hong Kong. On ten lectures, two raters used a validated observation form to rate the implementation quality of the lectures on a 13-item process evaluation scale. Consistent with the previous findings,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Child & Adolescent Health Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 253 - 262
Autores principales: Shek, Daniel T. L., Jianqiang Liang, Law, Moon Y. M.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=118800285&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 118800285
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19395930
        903I
      jtl: International Journal of Child & Adolescent Health
      issn: 19395930
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2016
      vid: 9
      iid: 2
      pid: 1040
      pub: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
      place: Hauppauge, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        118800285
        118800285
        118800285
        118800285
      ppf: 253
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Process evaluation of a university subject on service leadership in Hong Kong.
      aug:
        au:
          Shek, Daniel T. L.
          Jianqiang Liang
          Law, Moon Y. M.
        affil: Department of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, P.R. China
      sug:
        subj:
          Character
          Program Implementation
          Leadership
          Evaluation
          Scales Evaluation
          Lecture
      ab: A university subject on service leadership was evaluated via process evaluation at a university in Hong Kong. On ten lectures, two raters used a validated observation form to rate the implementation quality of the lectures on a 13-item process evaluation scale. Consistent with the previous findings, results showed that the scale and the ratings made by the observers were reliable. The mean ratings on the different dimensions were high and the qualitative comments were generally positive which suggested that the quality of program implementation was high. Regarding correlates of program implementation quality, some dimensions were significantly correlated with overall quality and program success.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N