The Recent Methods Debate in American Sociology and how Critical Realism fits into it.
This article concerns a recent methodological debate in American sociology that generated widespread attention in the United States. It was a debate that spanned at least four journals:American Journal of Sociology,Sociological Methods & Research,Qualitative SociologyandAmerican Journal of Cultural...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Critical Realism Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 342 - 352 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=118888501&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 118888501 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 14767430 7DS jtl: Journal of Critical Realism issn: 14767430 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2016 vid: 15 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 118888501 10.1080/14767430.2016.1193674 ppf: 342 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 119KB tig: atl: The Recent Methods Debate in American Sociology and how Critical Realism fits into it. aug: au: Porpora, Douglas V. affil: Drexel University, USA su: Sociology Critical realism Ontology Pluralism Ethical intuitionism sug: subj: Sociology Critical realism Ontology Pluralism Ethical intuitionism keyword: attitudes critical realism intuitionism motives research methods ab: This article concerns a recent methodological debate in American sociology that generated widespread attention in the United States. It was a debate that spanned at least four journals:American Journal of Sociology,Sociological Methods & Research,Qualitative SociologyandAmerican Journal of Cultural Sociology. As the debate was not just about methods per se but about the ‘theory of reality’ underlying each method and its ‘social ontology’, critical realism has much to say about it. Although at the end everyone comes around to critical realism's position of methodological pluralism, what makes the debate interesting is the reasoning, the ontological assumptions, and the surprising directions of attack. Above all this article will take issue with the assumption common to all disputants that people tend ‘to give self-contradictory and inadequate accounts of their actions and motives’. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Critical Realism is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Critical Realism holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|