Reliability and validity of a smartphone pulse rate application for the assessment of resting and elevated pulse rate.
Purpose/hypothesis: This study was designed to investigate the test–retest reliability, concurrent validity, and the standard error of measurement (SEm) of a pulse rate assessment application (Azumio®’s Instant Heart Rate) on both Android® and iOS® (iphone operating system) smartphones as compared t...
| Publicado en: | Physiotherapy Theory & Practice Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 494 - 500 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | equations & formulas pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2016
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=118889215&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 118889215 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09593985 BCJ jtl: Physiotherapy Theory & Practice issn: 09593985 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2016 vid: 32 iid: 6 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 118889215 118889215 118889215 10.1080/09593985.2016.1203046 118889215 ppf: 494 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Reliability and validity of a smartphone pulse rate application for the assessment of resting and elevated pulse rate. aug: au: Mitchell, Katy Graff, Megan Hedt, Corbin Simmons, James affil: School of Physical Therapy, Institute of Health Sciences – Houston Campus, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX, USA sug: subj: Smartphone Pulse Evaluation Mobile Applications Equipment Reliability Heart Rate Validation Studies Test-Retest Reliability Concurrent Validity Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Confidence Intervals Data Analysis Software P-Value Adult Middle Age Aged Female Male Human Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Female Male ab: Purpose/hypothesis: This study was designed to investigate the test–retest reliability, concurrent validity, and the standard error of measurement (SEm) of a pulse rate assessment application (Azumio®’s Instant Heart Rate) on both Android® and iOS® (iphone operating system) smartphones as compared to a FT7 Polar® Heart Rate monitor.Number of subjects: 111.Materials/methods: Resting (sitting) pulse rate was assessed twice and then the participants were asked to complete a 1-min standing step test and then immediately re-assessed. The smartphone assessors were blinded to their measurements.Results: Test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC 2,1] and 95% confidence interval) for the three tools at rest (time 1/time 2): iOS® (0.76 [0.67–0.83]); Polar® (0.84 [0.78–0.89]); and Android® (0.82 [0.75–0.88]). Concurrent validity at rest time 2 (ICC 2,1) with the Polar® device: IOS® (0.92 [0.88–0.94]) and Android® (0.95 [0.92–0.96]). Concurrent validity post-exercise (time 3) (ICC) with the Polar® device: iOS® (0.90 [0.86–0.93]) and Android® (0.94 [0.91–0.96]). The SEm values for the three devices at rest: iOS® (5.77 beats per minute [BPM]), Polar® (4.56 BPM) and Android® (4.96 BPM).Conclusions: The Android®, iOS®, and Polar® devices showed acceptable test–retest reliability at rest and post-exercise. Both the smartphone platforms demonstrated concurrent validity with the Polar® at rest and post-exercise.Clinical relevance: The Azumio® Instant Heart Rate application when used by either platform appears to be a reliable and valid tool to assess pulse rate in healthy individuals. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|