FIELDWORK IN THE NEW JERSEY ELECTION PREDICTION.

The errors recorded by most public opinion polls in reporting the recent election clearly indicate the need for a reexamination of procedures. Accurate measurements of public opinion on any issue depend on several factors: preparation of a valid cross-section of the universe to be studied; the best...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Public Opinion Quarterly Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 724 - 727
Autores principales: Fink, Kenneth, Lutz, Robert G.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Winter48/49
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=11926141&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 11926141
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0033362X
        POQ
      jtl: Public Opinion Quarterly
      issn: 0033362X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Winter48/49
      vid: 12
      iid: 4
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        11926141
        10.1086/266019
      ppf: 724
      ppct: 3
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: FIELDWORK IN THE NEW JERSEY ELECTION PREDICTION.
      aug:
        au:
          Fink, Kenneth
          Lutz, Robert G.
        affil: Princeton Research Service.
      su:
        Forecasting
        Public opinion polls
        Political campaigns
        Field research
        Public opinion
        Interviewing
        Voting
        Political candidates
        New Jersey
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          New Jersey
          United States
          Forecasting
          Public opinion polls
          Political campaigns
          Field research
          Public opinion
          Interviewing
          Voting
          Political candidates
      ab: The errors recorded by most public opinion polls in reporting the recent election clearly indicate the need for a reexamination of procedures. Accurate measurements of public opinion on any issue depend on several factors: preparation of a valid cross-section of the universe to be studied; the best possible fieldwork to insure that the cross-section is actually obtained; and correct timing. Of these three factors, careful fieldwork is the most difficult to secure and too often has received the least attention. In this connection the New Jersey Poll interviewing methods may highlight the importance of fieldwork in political forecasting and, for that matter, in all opinion research. The New Jersey Poll made predictions covering six candidates in New Jersey. All predictions were correct as to winners and standings. Definite reasons lie behind the employment of these techniques adopted for the opinion polls conducted in New Jersey. Each attacks a potential source of error which in most cases is likely to give a Republican bias on election forecasts. The irreducible statistical error is already of sufficient size to make predictions of close elections somewhat hazardous; therefore, every effort must be made to reduce the error subject to control.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1948
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N