Scaling Problems in a Study of Conceptions of Air Force Leader Roles.

Social scientists have often been warned about the dangers involved in extending scale results over time and to other populations. In this article, authors discuss the problems of extending inferences beyond the content of the items tested. They conclude that, at least until more is known about samp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Public Opinion Quarterly Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 279 - 287
Autores principales: Davis, F. James, Hagedorn, Robert, Larson, J. Robert
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Fall54
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=11934692&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 11934692
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0033362X
        POQ
      jtl: Public Opinion Quarterly
      issn: 0033362X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall54
      vid: 18
      iid: 3
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        11934692
        10.1086/266517
      ppf: 279
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Scaling Problems in a Study of Conceptions of Air Force Leader Roles.
      aug:
        au:
          Davis, F. James
          Hagedorn, Robert
          Larson, J. Robert
        affil: Department of Sociology, College of Wooster.
      su:
        Scaling (Social sciences)
        Statistical sampling
        Social science methodology
        Social scientists
        Inference (Logic)
        Attitude (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Scaling (Social sciences)
          Statistical sampling
          Social science methodology
          Social scientists
          Inference (Logic)
          Attitude (Psychology)
      ab: Social scientists have often been warned about the dangers involved in extending scale results over time and to other populations. In this article, authors discuss the problems of extending inferences beyond the content of the items tested. They conclude that, at least until more is known about sampling error, no inferences about scalability should be extended to untested items. The operations involved in defining and sampling an attitude area differ from those involved in testing a set of responses for scalability. Yet, after the attitude area is accepted as scalable and the scale types are used in the analysis of data, the definition and sampling of the area become crucial in making interpretations. The purposes of this article are, to describe the defining and item construction operations used in a role-conception study, to present the results obtained by the approach and to illustrate a position on the problem of how far the inference of scalability can be generalized from particular items.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1954
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N