LIBERALIZMO FILOSOFIJOS PARADOKSAI.

The aim of the paper is to demonstrate that after the publication of Political Liberalism by John Rawls we have to take a fresh look on the problem of the identity of liberal philosophy. Liberals do not have any independent moral and political philosophy. Their philosophical identity is based on a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 90; pp. 7 - 20
Autor principal: Jokubaitis, Alvydas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=119466617&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 119466617
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2016
      vid: 90
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        119466617
        10.15388/Problemos.2016.90.10131
      ppf: 7
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.9MB
      tig:
        atl: LIBERALIZMO FILOSOFIJOS PARADOKSAI.
      aug:
        au: Jokubaitis, Alvydas
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto, Politikos teorijos katedra, Vokiečių g. 10 LT-01130 Vilnius
      sug:
      keyword:
        civil religion
        ideology
        moral liberalism
        political liberalism
        ideologija
        moralinis liberalizmas
        pilietinė religija
        politinis liberalizmas
      ab:
        The aim of the paper is to demonstrate that after the publication of Political Liberalism by John Rawls we have to take a fresh look on the problem of the identity of liberal philosophy. Liberals do not have any independent moral and political philosophy. Their philosophical identity is based on a critique of the positions of their opponents and not on any positive doctrine. To gain a better understanding of the philosophy of liberalism we have to investigate the relationship of this philosophy with illiberal doctrines. Liberal moral and political philosophy is dependent on the objects of its critique. Liberal philosophy faces four paradoxes: 1) political liberalism equates illiberal and liberal political positions and this is the reason why the identity of liberal political philosophy remains elusive; 2) liberals advocate moral individualism, however, this individualism does not necessarily lead to moral philosophy of liberalism; 3) liberal moral philosophy has gaps which can only be filled with elements of illiberal moral philosophies; 4) liberals cannot establish their identity with philosophical arguments, they can only do this with the help of ideology. What today goes by the name of the philosophy of liberalism is a version of civil religion.
        Straipsnyje siekiama įrodyti, kad po Johno Rawlso Politinio liberalizmo pasirodymo būtina naujai pažvelgti į liberalizmo filosofijos tapatumą. Liberalai neturi savarankiškos moralės ir politikos filosofijos. Jų filosofinis tapatumas grindžiamas ne pozityvia doktrina, bet oponentų kritika. Norint suprasti liberalizmo filosofiją, reikia išsiaiškinti jos santykį su neliberaliomis doktrinomis. Liberalų moralės ir politikos filosofija priklauso nuo neliberalių pažiūrų kritikos. Liberalizmo filosofija susiduria su neįveikiamais paradoksais: 1) politinis liberalizmas sulygina liberalus ir neliberalus, taip neleisdamas užtikrinti liberalizmo politinės filosofijos išskirtinumo, 2) iš liberalų pripažįstamo moralinio individualizmo nebūtinai seka liberalizmo moralės filosofija, 3) liberalų moralės filosofija pasižymi esminiais trūkumais, kuriuos įmanoma įveikti tik remiantis neliberaliomis moralės filosofijomis, 4) savo idėjinį tapatumą liberalai gali užtikrinti tik pasitelkdami ideologiją, o ne filosofiją. Tai, kas vadinama liberalizmo filosofija, yra pilietinės religijos variantas.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N