CRIMINALIZATION OF CORRUPTION: PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL FACETS.
The article discusses philosophical, historical and social issues of corruption. The authors analyse the peculiarities of perception of corruption in different paradigms of criminal justice: classical, positivistic, and constructionist, as well as its respective interpretation in terms of vice and s...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 90; pp. 20 - 31 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=119466618&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 119466618 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2016 vid: 90 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 119466618 10.15388/Problemos.2016.90.10132 ppf: 20 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.7MB tig: atl: CRIMINALIZATION OF CORRUPTION: PHILOSOPHICAL AND LEGAL FACETS. aug: au: Čepas, Algimantas Dobryninas, Aleksandras affil: Vilnius University, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Sociology, Universiteto Str. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius su: Corruption laws Criminal law philosophy Transparency International Public interest Prosecution sug: subj: Corruption laws Criminal law philosophy Transparency International Public interest Prosecution keyword: corruption criminalization philosophy of criminal law baudžiamosios teisės filosofija korupcija kriminalizacija ab: The article discusses philosophical, historical and social issues of corruption. The authors analyse the peculiarities of perception of corruption in different paradigms of criminal justice: classical, positivistic, and constructionist, as well as its respective interpretation in terms of vice and sin, wrongful conduct, or conflict between public and private interests. The analysis presented allows to conclude that criminalization of corruption has its own legal logic and reflects existing social cultural context, and due to this reason cannot be considered to be a universal instrument of dealing with conflicts between public duties and private interests. Straipsnyje aptariami filosofiniai, istoriniai ir socialiniai korupcijos aspektai. Autoriai tiria, kaip korupciją suvokia skirtingos baudžiamojo teisingumo paradigmos - klasikinė, pozityvistinė ir konstrukcionistinė, kuriose korupcija atitinkamai interpretuojama kaip yda ir nuodėmė, blogas elgesys arba konfliktas tarp viešojo ir privataus intereso. Straipsnyje pateikiama analizė leidžia formuluoti išvadą, kad korupcijos kriminalizacija turi savo teisinę logiką ir yra priklausoma nuo konkretaus socialinio bei kultūrinio konteksto, todėl negali būti laikoma universaliu viešųjų ir privačių interesų konfliktų sprendimo įrankiu. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|