ONTOLOGINIS SEKSUALINĖS SKIRTIES ASPEKTAS L. IRIGARAY FILOSOFIJOJE.

The article analyses the transformation of the conception of sexual difference in the philosophy of Luce Irigaray. The controversy between essentialism and constructivism in philosophy of gender is the context of the analysed question and it is used as a heuristic scheme in this article. Taking into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 90; pp. 31 - 48
Autor principal: Dovydėnas, Andrius
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=119466619&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 119466619
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2016
      vid: 90
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        119466619
        10.15388/Problemos.2016.90.10133
      ppf: 31
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 3MB
      tig:
        atl: ONTOLOGINIS SEKSUALINĖS SKIRTIES ASPEKTAS L. IRIGARAY FILOSOFIJOJE.
      aug:
        au: Dovydėnas, Andrius
        affil: Vilniaus universiteto Filosofijos katedra, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius
      sug:
      keyword:
        feminine subjectivity
        genus (Gattung) identity
        Hegel
        sexual difference
        strategic essentialism
        giminės (Gattung) tapatybė
        Hegelis
        Irigaray
        mimesis
        moteriškoji subjektyvybė
        seksualinė skirtis
        strateginis esencializmas
      ab:
        The article analyses the transformation of the conception of sexual difference in the philosophy of Luce Irigaray. The controversy between essentialism and constructivism in philosophy of gender is the context of the analysed question and it is used as a heuristic scheme in this article. Taking into consideration this context, it is asserted that the early Irigaray's psychoanalytic conception of sexual difference and the mimesis as a means to constitute feminine subjectivity correspond only to political or "strategic essentialism". Meanwhile, in her transformative point of philosophy, in contesting Hegel's paradigm of the subject, Irigaray present a naturalistic conception of sexual difference, which already implies the ontological essentialism. Also the analysis includes the principle of genus identity in the philosophy of Hegel which had rested unexamined by Irigaray. The aim is not only to reveal the concept of Irigaray's feminine subjectivity, which comprises the irreducibility of femininity into a function of reproduction, the incommensurability of masculine and feminine subjectivities, but also to highlight the controversy of sexual difference and genus identity as two different paradigms of philosophy of the subject.
        Straipsnyje analizuojama seksualinės skirties sampratos transformacija Luce Irigaray filosofijoje. Straipsnio euristinė schema - esencializmo-konstruktyvizmo kontroversija giminės filosofijoje. Ja remiantis teigiama, kad ankstyvoji Irigaray psichoanalitinė seksualinės skirties samprata ir mimesis kaip moteriškosios subjektyvybės steigties būdas atitinka tik „strateginį esencializmą“, o transformaciniame filosofijos etape, ginčijant Hegelio subjekto paradigmą, Irigaray pateikta natūralistinė seksualinės skirties samprata jau implikuoja ontologinį esencializmą. Taip pat į analizę įtraukiamas Irigaray nenagrinėtas Hegelio giminės tapatybės principas, kuris implictiškai apima lyčių diferenciacijos aspektą. Tuo siekiama ne tik atskleisti Irigaray moteriškosios subjektyvybės sampratą, kuri apima moteriškumo neredukuojamumą į reprodukcijos funkciją, vyriškosios ir moteriškosios subjektyvybių nebendramatiškumą, bet taip pat išryškinti giminės tapatybės ir seksualinės skirties kontroversiją kaip dvi skirtingas subjekto filosofijos paradigmas.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N