DESCARTES, INDIFFERENT DECEIVER, AND RADICAL INTERPRETATION.
The aim of this paper is to show how and why the method of radical interpretation can solve the problems that are formulated in a variety of sceptical scenarios. First of all, the method of radical interpretation deprives Cartesian sceptical scenario - both in its traditional and more recent version...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 90; pp. 64 - 82 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=119466622&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 119466622 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2016 vid: 90 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 119466622 10.15388/Problemos.2016.90.10136 ppf: 64 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 3MB tig: atl: DESCARTES, INDIFFERENT DECEIVER, AND RADICAL INTERPRETATION. aug: au: Rogonyan, Garris affil: National Research University Higher School of Economics, Department of Sociology, St. Petersburg School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sedova Str. 55/2, 192171 St. Petersburg, Russia su: Cartesianism (Philosophy) Theory of knowledge Skepticism Radicals in literature Externalism (Philosophy of mind) Quine, Willard Van Orman, 1908-2000 sug: subj: Cartesianism (Philosophy) Theory of knowledge Skepticism Radicals in literature Externalism (Philosophy of mind) Quine, Willard Van Orman, 1908-2000 keyword: communication epistemological scepticism externalism radical interpretation eksternalizmas epistemologinis skepticizmas komunikacija radikali interpretacija ab: The aim of this paper is to show how and why the method of radical interpretation can solve the problems that are formulated in a variety of sceptical scenarios. First of all, the method of radical interpretation deprives Cartesian sceptical scenario - both in its traditional and more recent versions - of the status of philosophical problem appealing to the difference between intended and unintended lies. The paper also formulates an argument in favour of expanded version of naturalized epistemology due to the introduction of social factors. In particular, there are always at least two necessary limitations imposed by the communication of our hypothesis about knowledge and delusion. In addition, the article explains the need of a moderate externalism (both perceptual and social) for the variants of Descartes and Hume's sceptical scenario. Šio straipsnio tikslas yra parodyti, kaip ir kodėl radikalios interpretacijos metodas gali išspręsti problemas, formuluojamas įvairių skeptinių scenarijų pavidalu. Pirmiausia radikalios interpretacijos metodas neleidžia dekartiško skeptinio scenarijaus, tiek tradicinės, tiek naujesnių versijų, laikyti filosofine problema, kuri remiasi sąmoningo ir nesąmoningo melo skirtumu. Straipsnyje argumentuojama už išplėstinę natūralizuotos epistemologijos versiją, įtraukiančią ir socialinius veiksnius. Konkrečiau, hipotezių apie žinojimą ir apgaulę komunikavimui visuomet galioja bent du apribojimai. Be to, straipsnyje aiškinama nuosaikaus (percepcinio ir socialinio) eksternalizmo būtinybė dekartiškam ir hiumiškam skeptiniams scenarijams. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|