Impact of Orthodontic Brackets on the Intraoral Scan Data Accuracy.
This study aims to compare the impact of buccal and lingual brackets on the accuracy of dental arch data acquired by 4 different digital intraoral scanners. Two pairs of dental casts, one with buccal brackets and the other with lingual brackets, were used. Digital measurements of the 3D images were...
| Publicado en: | BioMed Research International Vol. 2016; pp. 1 - 7 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
11/23/2016
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=119732053&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 119732053 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 23146133 FT2T jtl: BioMed Research International issn: 23146133 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 11/23/2016 vid: 2016 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 119732053 119732053 119732053 10.1155/2016/5075182 119732053 ppf: 1 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Impact of Orthodontic Brackets on the Intraoral Scan Data Accuracy. aug: au: Park, Ji-Man Choi, Shin-Ae Myung, Ji-Yun Chun, Youn-Sic Kim, Minji affil: Department of Prosthodontics, Seoul National University Gwanak Dental Hospital, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea sug: subj: Orthodontic Brackets Diagnostic Imaging Validity Dental Arch Imaging, Three-Dimensional Descriptive Statistics Mann-Whitney U Test P-Value Dental Models Comparative Studies Data Analysis Software Confidence Intervals Cheek Tongue Body Weights and Measures Maxilla Mandible Molar Funding Source ab: This study aims to compare the impact of buccal and lingual brackets on the accuracy of dental arch data acquired by 4 different digital intraoral scanners. Two pairs of dental casts, one with buccal brackets and the other with lingual brackets, were used. Digital measurements of the 3D images were compared to the actual measurements of the dental models, which were considered standard values. The horizontal measurements included intercanine widths and intermolar widths. The Mann–Whitney U test was performed for comparisons. iTero® and Trios® both showed high accuracy with relatively small maximum deviation of measurements. iTero showed a significantly higher accuracy in most of the arch width measurements on the buccal bracket model than on the lingual model (P<0.05). Zfx IntraScan® and E4D Dentist® produced maximum deviations of more than 2 mm from both the buccal and the lingual bracket models. After comparing the degree of distortion of the arch on the digital scans with actual measurements of the same models, iTero and Trios proved to be excellent in terms of trueness and precision. Nevertheless, digital intraoral scanners should be used more cautiously in arches with lingual brackets than in those with buccal brackets. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|