Primary or secondary tasks? Dual-task interference between cyclist hazard perception and cadence control using cross-modal sensory aids with rider assistance bike computers.
This research investigated the risks involved in bicycle riding while using various sensory modalities to deliver training information. To understand the risks associated with using bike computers, this study evaluated hazard perception performance through lab-based simulations of authentic riding c...
| Publicado en: | Applied Ergonomics pp. 65 - 73 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
Mar2017 Part A
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=119778277&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 119778277 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00036870 ALO jtl: Applied Ergonomics issn: 00036870 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2017 Part A pid: 82545 pub: Elsevier B.V. place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 119778277 119778277 NLM27890161 119778277 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.015 NLM27890161 119778277 ppf: 65 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Primary or secondary tasks? Dual-task interference between cyclist hazard perception and cadence control using cross-modal sensory aids with rider assistance bike computers. aug: au: Yang, Chao-Yang Wu, Cheng-Tse affil: Department of Industrial Design, Tatung University, No. 40, Sec. 3, Zhongshan N. Rd., Taipei City 104, Taiwan sug: subj: Accidents Computers and Computerization Cycling Psychosocial Factors Cognition Touch Eye Movements Female Acoustic Stimulation Physical Stimulation Data Display Perception Task Performance and Analysis Adult Adolescence Reaction Time Young Adult Male Attention Human Adult: 19-44 years Adolescent: 13-18 years Female Male ab: This research investigated the risks involved in bicycle riding while using various sensory modalities to deliver training information. To understand the risks associated with using bike computers, this study evaluated hazard perception performance through lab-based simulations of authentic riding conditions. Analysing hazard sensitivity (d') of signal detection theory, the rider's response time, and eye glances provided insights into the risks of using bike computers. In this study, 30 participants were tested with eight hazard perception tasks while they maintained a cadence of 60 ± 5 RPM and used bike computers with different sensory displays, namely visual, auditory, and tactile feedback signals. The results indicated that synchronously using different sense organs to receive cadence feedback significantly affects hazard perception performance; direct visual information leads to the worst rider distraction, with a mean sensitivity to hazards (d') of -1.03. For systems with multiple interacting sensory aids, auditory aids were found to result in the greatest reduction in sensitivity to hazards (d' mean = -0.57), whereas tactile sensory aids reduced the degree of rider distraction (d' mean = -0.23). Our work complements existing work in this domain by advancing the understanding of how to design devices that deliver information subtly, thereby preventing disruption of a rider's perception of road hazards. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|