To Deviate from Maidan (Polemical Remarks).

Although far from being a supporter of Russian officialdom, in the present article the author will defend a position of dissent in relation to Maidan. In his view, the problem with Maidan is its lack of dialogue, overt or covert appeal to force, disregard for the fragility of Ukraine as a whole, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Russian Studies in Philosophy Vol. 54; no. 3; pp. 212 - 223
Autor principal: Malakhov, Viktor A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=120229260&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 120229260
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10611967
        2CQ
      jtl: Russian Studies in Philosophy
      issn: 10611967
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2016
      vid: 54
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        120229260
        10.1080/10611967.2016.1251239
      ppf: 212
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 71KB
      tig:
        atl: To Deviate from Maidan (Polemical Remarks).
      aug:
        au: Malakhov, Viktor A.
      su:
        Euromaidan Revolution, Ukraine, 2014
        Social conflict
        Political movements
        Negotiation
        Russia-Ukraine relations
        Ukrainian social conditions
      sug:
        subj:
          Euromaidan Revolution, Ukraine, 2014
          Social conflict
          Political movements
          Negotiation
          Russia-Ukraine relations
          Ukrainian social conditions
      keyword:
        courage of compassion
        dialogue
        dissent
        Maidan
        war
      ab: Although far from being a supporter of Russian officialdom, in the present article the author will defend a position of dissent in relation to Maidan. In his view, the problem with Maidan is its lack of dialogue, overt or covert appeal to force, disregard for the fragility of Ukraine as a whole, and rejection of Ukraine's deep ties with Russia, which for Ukrainian culture are essential. According to this view, the phenomenon of Maidan, and the subsequent course of events, cannot be made to fit the Procrustean bed of preformed ideological stereotypes. Therefore, the current crisis in Ukraine and surrounding areas requires a more realistic approach, and a better understanding among the parties involved on the basis of fundamental human values. If realized, such an understanding could be a profound historical outcome of the current crisis.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Russian Studies in Philosophy is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Russian Studies in Philosophy
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N