Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor.

Introduction: Evidence suggests that many cancer chemotherapy patients who are candidates for colony-stimulating factor (CSF) prophylaxis do not receive it or receive it inconsistent with guidelines, and that such patients have a higher risk of febrile neutropenia hospitalization (FNH). Little is kn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Supportive Care in Cancer Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 439 - 448
Autores principales: Weycker, Derek, Li, Xiaoyan, Tzivelekis, Spiros, Atwood, Mark, Garcia, Jacob, Li, Yanli, Reiner, Maureen, Lyman, Gary, Lyman, Gary H
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=120437030&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 120437030
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09414355
        O1J
      jtl: Supportive Care in Cancer
      issn: 09414355
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2017
      vid: 25
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        120437030
        120437030
        144028815
        NLM27734153
        120437030
        10.1007/s00520-016-3421-x
        NLM27734153
        120437030
      ppf: 439
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor.
      aug:
        au:
          Weycker, Derek
          Li, Xiaoyan
          Tzivelekis, Spiros
          Atwood, Mark
          Garcia, Jacob
          Li, Yanli
          Reiner, Maureen
          Lyman, Gary
          Lyman, Gary H
        affil: Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI) , Four Davis Court Brookline 02445 USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Colony-Stimulating Factors Administration and Dosage
          Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Administration and Dosage
          Risk Factors
          Middle Age
          Female
          Retrospective Design
          Breast Neoplasms Drug Therapy
          Aged
          Hospitalization Statistics and Numerical Data
          Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin's Drug Therapy
          Antineoplastic Agents, Combined Adverse Effects
          Neutropenia Chemically Induced
          Prospective Studies
          Human
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Female
      ab: Introduction: Evidence suggests that many cancer chemotherapy patients who are candidates for colony-stimulating factor (CSF) prophylaxis do not receive it or receive it inconsistent with guidelines, and that such patients have a higher risk of febrile neutropenia hospitalization (FNH). Little is known about the number and consequences of FNH by use/patterns of CSF prophylaxis in US clinical practice.Methods: A retrospective cohort design and private healthcare claims data were employed. Study population comprised adults who received a chemotherapy course with a high-risk regimen, or an intermediate-risk regimen (if ≥1 FN risk factor present), for non-metastatic breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL); each chemotherapy cycle within the course and each FNH episode within the cycles were identified. Consequences included mortality, inpatient days, and costs (US$2013) during FNH. Use (yes/no) and patterns (agent, administration day/duration) of CSF prophylaxis were evaluated within cycles in which FNH episodes occurred.Results: Among all FNH episodes (n=6,355; 109 episodes per 1,000 patients), 41.3% (95% CI: 40.1-42.5) occurred among patients who did not receive CSF prophylaxis in that cycle, and 8.8% (8.1-9.5) occurred among those who received CSF prophylaxis on the same day as chemotherapy. Among FNH episodes occurring in patients who received daily CSF agents (2% of CSF use), 56.1% (44.1-68.0) received prophylaxis <7 days during the cycle. Results for FNH consequences were comparable.Conclusions: In this retrospective evaluation, one-half of FNH episodes, outcomes, and costs among cancer chemotherapy patients who were candidates for CSF prophylaxis occurred in those who either did not receive it or received it inconsistent with guidelines.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N