Controlling Administrative Discretion Promotes Social Equity? Evidence from a Natural Experiment.

Although social equity has been a formal pillar of public administration for decades, identifying mechanisms through which public officials inadvertently reproduce unfair conditions remains a relevant topic. In particular, it is important to understand how the habits and practices of street-level bu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Public Administration Review Vol. 77; no. 1; pp. 80 - 90
Autores principales: Cárdenas, Sergio, Ramírez de la Cruz, Edgar E.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan/Feb2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Although social equity has been a formal pillar of public administration for decades, identifying mechanisms through which public officials inadvertently reproduce unfair conditions remains a relevant topic. In particular, it is important to understand how the habits and practices of street-level bureaucrats may result in an unjust allocation of public resources. This article provides evidence on how the administrative discretion conferred on school principals may result in an efficient but unfair condition regarding the allocation of students across schools, thus undermining social equity. By exploiting a natural experiment, we are able to provide reliable evidence on how controlling administrative discretion decreases the segregation of students based on their socioeconomic status.