ARCHITEKTŪROS ORIGINALUMO SĄSAJOS SU LAIKO PROGRESO IDĖJA.

This article examines the connection between the originality of architecture and the idea of time progress from the start of professional Western architecture to contemporary architecture. The Ancient Greeks already knew how to exploit traditional similitude or highlighted innovation in architecture...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) no. 89; pp. 213 - 223
Autor principal: ORŽIKAUSKAS, GYTIS
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Logos 2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=120591483&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 120591483
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08687692
        8XKW
      jtl: Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692)
      issn: 08687692
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2016
      iid: 89
      pid: 53094
      pub: Logos
    artinfo:
      ui:
        120591483
        10.5200/logos.2016.13
      ppf: 213
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.1MB
      tig:
        atl: ARCHITEKTŪROS ORIGINALUMO SĄSAJOS SU LAIKO PROGRESO IDĖJA.
      aug:
        au: ORŽIKAUSKAS, GYTIS
        affil: Vilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas, Lietuva
      sug:
      keyword:
        contemporary architecture
        individuality
        movement
        style
        time context
        šiuolaikinė architektūra
        kryptis
        laiko kontekstas
        savitumas
        stilius
      ab:
        This article examines the connection between the originality of architecture and the idea of time progress from the start of professional Western architecture to contemporary architecture. The Ancient Greeks already knew how to exploit traditional similitude or highlighted innovation in architecture in order to express the necessary cultural message. Architectural progress was no longer so important during medieval period, because Christian culture established a finite concept of time, according to which both past and future were equally revealed. The progress of architecture was spontaneous up until 17th century, when the theory of architectural styles was established. During this period newly created retrospective architecture was considered to be equal to the architecture of past styles. However, at the beginning of 20th century architectural styles were diluted into one theory of decoration, which provoked the arrival of new uniform modernist architectural style. However, the theory of architectural styles is limited, because especially original architecture does not follow common established rules of architectural style. As such contemporary architecture must be evaluated by alternative concepts of progress, such as cyclic rotation of architectural trends and an established pluralism. Those circumstances are especially favorable for the rise of nonstandard architectural expression.
        Straipsnyje nagrinėjama architektūros originalumo sąsaja su laiko progreso idėja nuo Vakarų profesionaliosios architektūros pradžios iki šiuolaikinės architektūros. Jau senovės Graikijos architektūroje suvokta, kad naujai kuriamos architektūros pabrėžtina inovacija arba perteiktas tradicijų tęsinys gali būti išnaudotas reikiamai kultūrinei žiniai perteikti. Viduramžių architektūroje progresas laiko tėkmėje nustojo aktualumo, kadangi krikščioniškoji kultūra tikėjo baigtine laiko koncepcija su nulemta pradžia ir pabaiga. Architektūra organiškai plėtojosi iki pat XVIII a., kai buvo suformuota architektūros stilių teorija. Šiuo laikotarpiu buvo įtikėta, kad naujai kuriama retrospektyvi architektūra gali lygiomis teisėmis atstovauti praėjusiems architektūros stiliams. Tačiau iki XX a. pr. plėtota stilių raidos teorija visus istorinius architektūros stilius traktavo vienodai - kaip dekoro priemonę, į kurią buvo suformuotas reaktyvus, tačiau vienodas modernizmo stilius. Stilių raidos teorija yra ribota, kadangi itin originali, bendrų stiliaus nuostatų neatitinkanti architektūra lieka neįvertinta. Todėl šiuolaikinės architektūros progresas turi būti vertinamas alternatyviai: kaip cikliškos architektūros tendencijų kaitos bei vyraujančio kultūrinio daugybingumo apraiška. Šios sąlygos yra ypatingai palankios originaliai nestandartinei architektūros raiškai rastis.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692) is the property of Logos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Logos: A Journal, of Religion, Philosophy Comparative Cultural Studies & Art (08687692)
      holder: Logos
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N