Responsibility and vigilance.

My primary target in this paper is a puzzle that emerges from the conjunction of several seemingly innocent assumptions in action theory and the metaphysics of moral responsibility. The puzzle I have in mind is this. On one widely held account of moral responsibility, an agent is morally responsible...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 174; no. 2; pp. 507 - 528
Autor principal: Murray, Samuel
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=120629580&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 120629580
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2017
      vid: 174
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        120629580
        10.1007/s11098-016-0694-3
      ppf: 507
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 460KB
      tig:
        atl: Responsibility and vigilance.
      aug:
        au: Murray, Samuel
        affil: University of Notre Dame , Notre Dame USA
      su:
        Responsibility
        Metaphysics
        Ethics
        Vigilance (Psychology)
        Salvage (Maritime)
      sug:
        subj:
          Responsibility
          Metaphysics
          Ethics
          Vigilance (Psychology)
          Salvage (Maritime)
      keyword:
        Cognitive neuroscience
        Moral agency
        Moral responsibility
        Omissions
        Tracing
        Vigilance
      ab: My primary target in this paper is a puzzle that emerges from the conjunction of several seemingly innocent assumptions in action theory and the metaphysics of moral responsibility. The puzzle I have in mind is this. On one widely held account of moral responsibility, an agent is morally responsible only for those actions or outcomes over which that agent exercises control. Recently, however, some have cited cases where agents appear to be morally responsible without exercising any control. This leads some to abandon the control-based account of responsibility and replace it with an alternative account. It leads others to deny the intuition that agents are responsible in these troublesome cases. After outlining the account of moral responsibility I have in mind, I look at some of the arguments made against the viability of this theory. I show that there are conceptual resources for salvaging the control account, focusing in particular on the nature of vigilance. I also argue that there is empirical data that supports the control account so conceived.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2017. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2017
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N