Disagreements Over Analogies.
This essay presents a dialogical framework for treating philosophical disagreements as persuasion dialogues with analogical argumentation, with the aim of recasting philosophical disputes as disagreements over analogies. This has two benefits: (1) it allows us to temporarily bypass conflicting metap...
| Publicado en: | Metaphilosophy Vol. 48; no. 1/2; pp. 153 - 183 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jan2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=120747171&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 120747171 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00261068 9OM jtl: Metaphilosophy issn: 00261068 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jan2017 vid: 48 iid: 1/2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 120747171 10.1111/meta.12230 ppf: 153 ppct: 30 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 168KB tig: atl: Disagreements Over Analogies. aug: au: Laas, Oliver affil: School of Humanities, Tallinn University, Uus‐Sadama 5, 10120, Tallinn Estonia su: Analogy Persuasion (Psychology) Debate Metaphysics Intellectual property sug: subj: Analogy Persuasion (Psychology) Debate Metaphysics Intellectual property keyword: analogy argumentation theory arguments from analogy logic philosophical disagreements ab: This essay presents a dialogical framework for treating philosophical disagreements as persuasion dialogues with analogical argumentation, with the aim of recasting philosophical disputes as disagreements over analogies. This has two benefits: (1) it allows us to temporarily bypass conflicting metaphysical intuitions by focusing on paradigmatic examples, (dis)similarities, and the plausibility of conclusions for or against a given point of view; and (2) it can reveal new avenues of argumentation regarding a given issue. This approach to philosophical disagreements is illustrated by studying the role of argumentation by analogy in disputes over Lockean justifications of intellectual property rights, and disagreements over whether artificial agents should be treated as moral agents. Finally, a nonexhaustive list of possible global and local points of contention over analogical arguments is identified in order to highlight potential avenues of argumentation in disagreements over analogies. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Metaphilosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Metaphilosophy holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|