TEMPORALIZATION OF TOUCH AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR EMBODIMENT.
Edmund Husserl's concept of touch, as developed in Ideas II, was widely discussed and became the starting point for various explanations of the constitution of the lived body in phenomenological research and beyond. Localization and therefore spatial aspects are the main characteristics for the live...
| Published in: | Phainomena Vol. 25; no. 98/99; pp. 133 - 154 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Phenomenological Society of Ljubljana
nov2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=120829838&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 120829838 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13183362 TAZ jtl: Phainomena issn: 13183362 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: nov2016 vid: 25 iid: 98/99 pid: 20740 pub: Phenomenological Society of Ljubljana artinfo: ui: 120829838 ppf: 133 ppct: 21 formats: tig: atl: TEMPORALIZATION OF TOUCH AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR EMBODIMENT. aug: au: Garstenauer, Julia su: Touch -- Psychological aspects Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938 Brain function localization sug: subj: Touch -- Psychological aspects Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938 Brain function localization keyword: Derrida embodiment Husserl temporality touch časovnost dotik uteleenje ab: Edmund Husserl's concept of touch, as developed in Ideas II, was widely discussed and became the starting point for various explanations of the constitution of the lived body in phenomenological research and beyond. Localization and therefore spatial aspects are the main characteristics for the lived body in Husserl's works, whereas temporal aspects are rarely considered. For this reason, the present paper argues that a pre-reflective bodily constitution occurs not only in the form of localization but also in the form of temporalization. Against the background of an expanded concept of touching, construed as a realization of borders, temporalization is characterized as a continuous and constant being-towards-the-world. It is withdrawn from consciousness, and, in it, the three time ecstasies are intertwined and influence each other. However, the continuity of temporalization is necessarily fractured or deferred. While Husserl, especially in his famous example of the double sensation of the two hands touching each other, claims that there is a co-presence of physical body (Körper) and lived body (Leib), I will try to show, by drawing on cases such as injury and phantom limb sensations, that there occurs a time deferral, ranging from a fracture in phantom limb sensations to a minimal deferral in self-touch. This has two main consequences for embodiment. Firstly, temporalization is a necessary process in the constitution of the lived body: having a (lived) body means having time. Secondly, the relations between consciousness and (lived) body, as well as physical body and lived body, are not simultaneous, but are constantly shifting, and thus never completely coincide. Pojem dotika, kakor ga je Edmund Husserl razvil v Idejah II, je bil obravnavan mnogokrat in je postal izhodiče za različne razlage konstitucije ivega telesa znotraj fenomenolokih raziskav in onkraj njih. Lokalizacija in z njo povezani prostorski vidiki igrajo v Husserlovih delih poglavitno značilnost ivega telesa, medtem ko se časovnim vidikom posveča zgolj poredkoma. Iz tega razloga pričujoči prispevek poudarja, da se predrefleksivna telesna konstitucija ne dogaja samo v obliki lokalizacije, temveč tudi v obliki temporalizacije. Na ozadju razirjenega pojma dotikanja, dojetega kot udejanjanja meja, lahko temporalizacijo označimo kot kontinuirano in konstantno bit-naproti-svetu, ki se izmika zavedanju in v kateri se tri časovne ekstaze medsebojno prepletajo in vplivajo ena na drugo. Toda kontinuiteta temporalizacije se po nujnosti prelamlja in odgodeva. Medtem ko Husserl, zlasti ob znamenitem primeru dvojnega občutka rok, ki se dotikata, zatrjuje, da obstoji so-prisotnost fizičnega telesa (nem. Körper) in ivega telesa (nem. Leib), poskuam s sklicevanjem na primere, kot so pokodba in zaznava fantomskega uda, pokazati, da pride do časovnega odloga, ki sega od zloma pri občutku fantomskega uda do minimalnega zamika pri samodotiku. To naznanja dvoje posledic za uteleenje. Prvič, temporalizacija je nujen proces pri konstituciji ivega telesa: imeti (ivo) telo pomeni imeti čas. Drugič, v razmerju med zavedanjem in (ivim) telesom, tako kot v razmerju med fizičnim in ivim telesom, ni simultanosti, temveč se odnosi nenehno spreminjajo in zatorej nikdar ne pride do popolnega sovpadanja. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|