Survey of Non-Rigid Registration Tools in Medicine.
We catalogue available software solutions for non-rigid image registration to support scientists in selecting suitable tools for specific medical registration purposes. Registration tools were identified using non-systematic search in Pubmed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore® Digital Library, Google Scho...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 102 - 117 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Feb2017
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=120947493&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 120947493 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 08971889 DOQ jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging issn: 08971889 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2017 vid: 30 iid: 1 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 120947493 120947493 144145543 120947493 10.1007/s10278-016-9915-8 120947493 ppf: 102 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Survey of Non-Rigid Registration Tools in Medicine. aug: au: Keszei, András Berkels, Benjamin Deserno, Thomas affil: Department of Medical Informatics , RWTH Aachen University , Pauwelsstr. 30 D-52057 Aachen Germany sug: subj: Image Processing, Computer Assisted Equipment and Supplies Software Classification ab: We catalogue available software solutions for non-rigid image registration to support scientists in selecting suitable tools for specific medical registration purposes. Registration tools were identified using non-systematic search in Pubmed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore® Digital Library, Google Scholar, and through references in identified sources ( n = 22). Exclusions are due to unavailability or inappropriateness. The remaining ( n = 18) tools were classified by (i) access and technology, (ii) interfaces and application, (iii) living community, (iv) supported file formats, and (v) types of registration methodologies emphasizing the similarity measures implemented. Out of the 18 tools, (i) 12 are open source, 8 are released under a permissive free license, which imposes the least restrictions on the use and further development of the tool, 8 provide graphical processing unit (GPU) support; (ii) 7 are built on software platforms, 5 were developed for brain image registration; (iii) 6 are under active development but only 3 have had their last update in 2015 or 2016; (iv) 16 support the Analyze format, while 7 file formats can be read with only one of the tools; and (v) 6 provide multiple registration methods and 6 provide landmark-based registration methods. Based on open source, licensing, GPU support, active community, several file formats, algorithms, and similarity measures, the tools Elastics and Plastimatch are chosen for the platform ITK and without platform requirements, respectively. Researchers in medical image analysis already have a large choice of registration tools freely available. However, the most recently published algorithms may not be included in the tools, yet. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|